MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412510363 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-01174mtgabs

All-Solid-State Ceramic Batteries from Hydro-Québec: Methodology, Performances and Future Developments through Interfaces Engineering and Electrochemical Advanced Measurements

2025· article· en· W4412510363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benoît Fleutot, Emmanuelle Garitte, Fabien Nassoy, Lara Faour, Charlotte Mallet, Jean‐Christophe Daigle, Benjamin Cruel, Jean-François Filion, Isabelle Filteau, Amélie Forand, Marie-Claude Girard, K. Tremblay, Chisu Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeramicElectrochemistrySolid-stateMaterials scienceEngineering physicsEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringNanotechnologyMechanical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite some progress performed, state-of-the-art lithium ion batteries still require improvements in energy and power to extend the range of electric vehicles and reduce charging time. In this domain, all-solid-state batteries are viable alternatives to conventional batteries employing organic electrolytes because of their benefits, i.e., high power density, high energy density, long-life operation and safety. These advantages stem from the great features of inorganic solid electrolytes, which are single ion conductor, so a high lithium ion transport number, and no-liquid nature. In particular, the sulfide-based solid electrolytes possess favorable mechanical properties, high ionic conductivity allowing improved all-solid-state batteries performances at room temperature but suffer of moisture exposure that could induce H2S generation. Sulfide-based solid-electrolytes can potentially be employed in conjunction with a lithium metal negative electrode and 5V-class high voltage positive electrode material. Indeed, lithium metal is believed to be the most promising negative electrode due to its specific large capacity (3862 mAh.g-1) and the lowest electrochemical potential (-3.03V vs ENH). Ceramic solid electrolytes and especially sulfide composite solid electrolyte have been considered to be the ideal solution to prevent dendrite growth because of their high shear modulus and high lithium transference number. At the same time, the chemical nature and composition of ceramic solid electrolyte can affect the dendrite growth by the interfacial chemical and electrochemical stability with lithium metal. In parallel, the sulfide solid electrolyte reacts with all components constituting the positive electrode as active material, electronic conductor, binder, current collector... Hence, all interfaces can generate side reaction, increase of polarisation, and so rapid battery fading. As demonstrated in literature, an important average pressure increase during cycling and aging can’t allow a future commercialisation of this technology. The safety is a crucial point and the generation of H2S in the case of all-solid-state battery based on sulfide electrolyte during scale-up phase and operation must be take into account and evaluated specifically. In this field and since a few years, Hydro-Quebec has decided to conduct specific research on all-solid ceramic batteries and especially in the field of sulfide-based ceramic electrolytes. Based on Hydro-Québec's knowledge with polymers, a solution of all-solid composite battery with ceramic tendency has been developed by generating several industrial properties at the different levels of the battery. The interaction previously observed in positive electrode mixture without binder have been resolved and integrated in slurry. In parallel, the impact between solid electrolyte ceramic film composition, density, reactivity with lithium metal and flexibility were studied to offer high conductivity and easily manipulation. Unlike the general perception that the sulfide electrolyte is not compatible with lithium metal, we successfully stabilized the lithium metal interface reaching the cycle life more than 700 cycles under industry-relevant pressure conditions at moderate temperature under pouch-cell configuration. The constraints of the use of li-ion equipment’s, cost reduction and safety have been considered at each level with quantitative measurements. Different parameters can influence the performances and aging of all solid state ceramic battery. To explore them, various electrochemical technics and associated specific treatments can be developed to extract and identify each phenomenon and ensure the better development of this technology. A specific sequential methodology will be presented with different examples from the materials, interfaces with lithium metal, pseudo-composites and temperature effects up to aging of total all-solid–state ceramic battery based on sulfide technology. The different improvements in positive composite electrode, in solid electrolyte ceramic film and in lithium metal interfaces will be explained. The presentation will show how technical and economical issues of sulfide electrolyte can be addressed to bring the technology closer to the market

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→