Book Review: <i>The Scattered Library: The Various Fates of the Remnants of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science Collection in France and Czechoslovakia, 1932–1942</i> by Hans P. Soetaert SoetaertHans P., <i>The Scattered Library: The Various Fates of the Remnants of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science Collection in France and Czechoslovakia, 1932–1942</i> , Ibidem: New York, 2024; 850 pp.; 9783838218953, $81.00 (hbk)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scholars of German queer and trans history have long been fascinated with the looting of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science by a group of Nazi students and the subsequent destruction of the institute's library in the infamous book burnings on 10 May 1933.Taking place just three months after Hitler came into power, these events are often represented as the turning point from the relative sexual freedoms of the Weimar Republic to the violent attacks against and persecution of homosexuals and transvestites under the Nazi regime.However, contrary to popular beliefand its accompanying melancholic attachmentnot all the contents of Hirschfeld's personal archive and the Institute's collection of books, magazines, patient questionnaires, and ethnological objects were lost to the flames.Rather than understanding the book burnings as an end point of the Institute's history, in The Scattered Library, Hans P. Soetaert provides a meticulously researched account of how the surviving remnants of Hirschfeld's library were dispersed across France, Czechoslovakia, Germany, Canada, and the USA.Focusing on the three years leading up to Hirschfeld's death in 1935 and the fate of his estate in the years that followed, the author traces the complex history of the library's fragmentation.In 18 heavily footnoted chapters, followed by an extensive appendix, the book offers, on the one hand, an investigative report on the history of the Institute's material in France and Czechoslovakia, how it traversed borders, was kept in mysterious storerooms, hidden and smuggled across countries, confiscated by authorities, auctioned-off and repurchased, until finally some of the material was rediscovered in an old paper container.On the other hand, the book delivers the first extensive biography of the Institute's archivist and Hirschfeld's life companion Karl Giese and the Jewish lawyer and gay activist Karl Fein .Both played a key role in the afterlife of the Institute's materials, as Soetaert illustrates by shedding light on their decisions, their motives and the repercussions of their actions, which were always shaped in response to the expansion of Nazi power.The first eight chapters trace Hirschfeld's and Giese's exile journeys following Hirschfeld's return from his world tour.Here, Soetaert gives a detailed account of the proceedings of the 1932 World League for Sexual Reform conference in Brno, which Hirschfeld and Giese both attended and where they first met Karl Fein.After recounting the lootings of the Institute in May 1933, adding new insights that challenge established narratives around the book burnings by not only arguing against the myth of a completely destroyed library, but also the conception of Nazism as an infallible machine, the book gives a detailed account of Hirschfeld's unsuccessful attempts to rebuild the Institute
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,057 | 0,021 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».