MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412612792 · doi:10.1177/02656914251350851i

Book Review: <i>The Scattered Library: The Various Fates of the Remnants of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science Collection in France and Czechoslovakia, 1932–1942</i> by Hans P. Soetaert SoetaertHans P., <i>The Scattered Library: The Various Fates of the Remnants of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science Collection in France and Czechoslovakia, 1932–1942</i> , Ibidem: New York, 2024; 850 pp.; 9783838218953, $81.00 (hbk)

2025· article· en· W4412612792 on OpenAlexaff
Jonah I. Garde

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean History Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceSociologyClassicsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scholars of German queer and trans history have long been fascinated with the looting of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexual Science by a group of Nazi students and the subsequent destruction of the institute's library in the infamous book burnings on 10 May 1933.Taking place just three months after Hitler came into power, these events are often represented as the turning point from the relative sexual freedoms of the Weimar Republic to the violent attacks against and persecution of homosexuals and transvestites under the Nazi regime.However, contrary to popular beliefand its accompanying melancholic attachmentnot all the contents of Hirschfeld's personal archive and the Institute's collection of books, magazines, patient questionnaires, and ethnological objects were lost to the flames.Rather than understanding the book burnings as an end point of the Institute's history, in The Scattered Library, Hans P. Soetaert provides a meticulously researched account of how the surviving remnants of Hirschfeld's library were dispersed across France, Czechoslovakia, Germany, Canada, and the USA.Focusing on the three years leading up to Hirschfeld's death in 1935 and the fate of his estate in the years that followed, the author traces the complex history of the library's fragmentation.In 18 heavily footnoted chapters, followed by an extensive appendix, the book offers, on the one hand, an investigative report on the history of the Institute's material in France and Czechoslovakia, how it traversed borders, was kept in mysterious storerooms, hidden and smuggled across countries, confiscated by authorities, auctioned-off and repurchased, until finally some of the material was rediscovered in an old paper container.On the other hand, the book delivers the first extensive biography of the Institute's archivist and Hirschfeld's life companion Karl Giese and the Jewish lawyer and gay activist Karl Fein .Both played a key role in the afterlife of the Institute's materials, as Soetaert illustrates by shedding light on their decisions, their motives and the repercussions of their actions, which were always shaped in response to the expansion of Nazi power.The first eight chapters trace Hirschfeld's and Giese's exile journeys following Hirschfeld's return from his world tour.Here, Soetaert gives a detailed account of the proceedings of the 1932 World League for Sexual Reform conference in Brno, which Hirschfeld and Giese both attended and where they first met Karl Fein.After recounting the lootings of the Institute in May 1933, adding new insights that challenge established narratives around the book burnings by not only arguing against the myth of a completely destroyed library, but also the conception of Nazism as an infallible machine, the book gives a detailed account of Hirschfeld's unsuccessful attempts to rebuild the Institute

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean History QuarterlySame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207