Trends Over Time in Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Very Preterm
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Progress in perinatal care has improved survival for children born very preterm (VPT), but these children remain at higher risk of cognitive impairment compared with children born at term. Objective: To synthesize cohort studies on childhood cognitive ability following VPT birth to investigate trends over time. Data Sources: All studies from 5 previous meta-analyses of VPT birth and cognition published before 2019 were included, and PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched for new studies published up to June 2024. Study Selection: Studies reporting IQ scores of children (aged <18 years) born VPT (<32 weeks' gestational age [GA] or birth weight <1500 g) with a term-born comparison group were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and evaluated study quality using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Unique cohorts were identified to avoid duplicate measures from studies on the same children. Main Outcomes and Measures: The standardized mean difference (SMD) of IQ scores between VPT-born and term-born children was calculated, and mixed-effects metaregression was used to investigate linear and nonlinear associations between median birth year and the SMD. The main analysis focused on cohorts with IQ measured between 4 and 7 years of age to allow comparison at similar assessment ages. Secondary analyses were conducted in all cohorts using IQ obtained at the latest assessment age. Results: A total of 257 studies reported data from 131 cohorts of 25 746 individuals born from 1977 to 2016 (15 548 born VPT and 10 198 at term). In the 61 cohorts assessed at age 4 to 7 years (13 842 children born between 1977 and 2014 [8847 born VPT and 4995 at term]; mean [SD] GA, 28.2 [1.7] weeks for the VPT cohorts), IQ was lower for VPT-born children compared with term-born children (SMD = -0.88; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.79). The linear model showed no association with birth year (β = -0.002; 95% CI,-0.012 to 0.008). Three types of nonlinear models were fit, with no nonlinear associations observed. Adjustment for GA and study characteristics did not change the results (β = -0.001; 95% CI, -0.013 to 0.011). Secondary analysis of 131 cohorts found a similar difference between VPT and term groups (SMD = -0.84; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.79), with no time trend (β = 0.001; 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.007). Conclusions and Relevance: On average, children born VPT had significantly lower IQ scores than term-born children, and this deficit did not decrease in studies conducted over 4 decades.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,053 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».