MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trends Over Time in Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Very Preterm

2025· article· en· W4412700368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Soodabeh Behboodi, Anna Chaimani, Valérie Benhammou, E. Sabrina Twilhaar, Samantha Johnson, Jennifer Zeitlin, Mariane Sentenac

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational agePediatricsBirth weightCohort studyPsycINFOCognitionIntelligence quotientLow birth weightCohortMEDLINEDemographyPregnancyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Progress in perinatal care has improved survival for children born very preterm (VPT), but these children remain at higher risk of cognitive impairment compared with children born at term. Objective: To synthesize cohort studies on childhood cognitive ability following VPT birth to investigate trends over time. Data Sources: All studies from 5 previous meta-analyses of VPT birth and cognition published before 2019 were included, and PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched for new studies published up to June 2024. Study Selection: Studies reporting IQ scores of children (aged <18 years) born VPT (<32 weeks' gestational age [GA] or birth weight <1500 g) with a term-born comparison group were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and evaluated study quality using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Unique cohorts were identified to avoid duplicate measures from studies on the same children. Main Outcomes and Measures: The standardized mean difference (SMD) of IQ scores between VPT-born and term-born children was calculated, and mixed-effects metaregression was used to investigate linear and nonlinear associations between median birth year and the SMD. The main analysis focused on cohorts with IQ measured between 4 and 7 years of age to allow comparison at similar assessment ages. Secondary analyses were conducted in all cohorts using IQ obtained at the latest assessment age. Results: A total of 257 studies reported data from 131 cohorts of 25 746 individuals born from 1977 to 2016 (15 548 born VPT and 10 198 at term). In the 61 cohorts assessed at age 4 to 7 years (13 842 children born between 1977 and 2014 [8847 born VPT and 4995 at term]; mean [SD] GA, 28.2 [1.7] weeks for the VPT cohorts), IQ was lower for VPT-born children compared with term-born children (SMD = -0.88; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.79). The linear model showed no association with birth year (β = -0.002; 95% CI,-0.012 to 0.008). Three types of nonlinear models were fit, with no nonlinear associations observed. Adjustment for GA and study characteristics did not change the results (β = -0.001; 95% CI, -0.013 to 0.011). Secondary analysis of 131 cohorts found a similar difference between VPT and term groups (SMD = -0.84; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.79), with no time trend (β = 0.001; 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.007). Conclusions and Relevance: On average, children born VPT had significantly lower IQ scores than term-born children, and this deficit did not decrease in studies conducted over 4 decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA PediatricsSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207