MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412701861 · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01343-6

Transitions for youth and young adults with eating disorders and/or other mental health conditions: a Canadian guideline

2025· review· en· W4412701861 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Gina Dimitropoulos, Maria Nicula, Andrea Krishnapillai, Amelia Austin, Manya Singh, Cheryl Webb, Ana Almeida, C. Bergmann, Heidi Vander Steen, Melissa Kimber, Christopher J. Mushquash, Lia Norman, Jessica Sauerwein, Aaron Keshen, Ahmed Boachie, Alène Toulany, Andrea Levinson, Anita Federici, Brooke Allemang, Catherine Ford, Debra K. Katzman, Emily Tam, Gail McVey, Howard Steiger, Jennifer Scarborough, Jennifer S. Coelho, Jennifer E. Thannhauser, Josie Geller, Karleigh Darnay, Joanna Henderson, Katherine Bright, Katie Soper, Leanna Isserlin, Linda Booij, Melissa Brouwers, Michèle Laliberté, Monique Jericho, Nicole Obeid, Sarah H. Smith, Seena Grewal, Shauna MacEachern, Sheri Findlay, Wendy Preskow, Wendy Spettigue, Aryel Maharaj, Lori Wozney, Srividya N. Iyer, Mark L. Norris, Helen Vallianatos, Shaleen Jones, Émilie Lacroix, Manuela Ferrari, Cathleen Steinegger, Techiya Loewen, Joanne Gusella, Anick Leclerc, Natasha Johnson, Suzanne Phillips, Megan Patton, Zoya Punjwani, Katelyn Greer, Neera Bhatnagar, Jennifer Couturier

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Eating Disorders · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University Medical CentreCanadian Patient Safety InstituteMcMaster Children's HospitalUniversity of New BrunswickIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryCalgary Laboratory ServicesBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityMinistry of Health and Long Term CareAlberta Children's HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthMount Royal UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of TorontoDouglas Mental Health University InstituteChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioImpactSickKids FoundationUniversity of OttawaDalhousie UniversityRegional Municipality of WaterlooLakehead UniversityMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésGuidelineMental healthEating disordersPsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyGerontologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses with high rates of mortality, morbidity, and reduced quality of life. Their onset occurs during adolescence and early adulthood, coinciding with the critical transition from pediatric to adult care. To address the lack of guidelines to support ED transitions in Canada, this study developed evidence-based guideline recommendations. Scoping review methodology was employed using comprehensive searches across seven databases, supplemented by forward and backward citation chaining to identify records on youth and young adults (YYAs) (16–25 years) with EDs and/or mental health conditions transitioning from pediatric to adult care. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence for applicable studies. Using a modified Delphi method, the evidence was reviewed by a guideline development panel and consensus was achieved in a single round of voting. After de-duplication, 14,350 records from all sources were screened, with 1817 studies undergoing full-text review. A total of 419 studies were included. Of these, 199 were primary research studies which fell under one or more of the following categories: descriptive (n = 86), qualitative (n = 75), predictors (n = 48), transition interventions (n = 21), measurement tools (n = 8), and key outcomes (n = 3). The certainty of the evidence for specific interventions and tools was generally low. The panel issued strong recommendations for integrated, collaborative transition approaches involving YYAs, families, and providers, and for the use of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) to support transition planning. Additional recommendations are included, with an emphasis on future research focused on long-term outcomes such as care continuity and treatment retention. This research addressed the absence of a cohesive approach to transitions for YYAs experiencing EDs and/or mental health conditions, highlighting evidence variability and the need for a unified approach. These guidelines propose actionable steps for improving care transitions for YYAs with EDs and/or mental health conditions by promoting collaborative care models, prioritizing outcome-focused research, and using measurement tools. Young people with eating disorders (EDs) and/or other mental health conditions often face challenges when moving from pediatric to adult care, both in mental health and physical health realms. This transition typically occurs during adolescence or early adulthood which is a critical developmental period when continuation of care and support is essential. In Canada, there are no clear guidelines to help navigate this process. To address this gap, our team developed six recommendations based on a comprehensive scoping review of existing research. In these recommendations, we emphasize the importance of a collaborative approach that involves young people, families, and healthcare providers to ensure continuity and coordination of their care during the transition. In addition, research should prioritize the study of long-term outcomes, such as whether young people stay in treatment, leave early, or achieve successful transitions. Tools like the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) can help assess how prepared someone is for this change, but these tools need more testing to ensure they work well for people with EDs. These guidelines aim to improve care during this transition and to ensure that young people with EDs and/or other mental health conditions are prepared and supported as they move into adult healthcare services.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,041
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,153
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,383

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0410,075
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,006
Bibliométrie0,0150,014
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,003
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0080,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,435
Écart entre enseignants0,381 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Eating DisordersMême sujetAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareTravaux en français237 207