Transfer of skills acquired through Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO‐OP) approach in children with executive functions deficits following acquired brain injury
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Children with acquired brain injury (ABI) often have executive function (EF) deficits that affect their ability to carry out activities efficiently. Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) is a cognitive approach to problem-solving. It has demonstrated effectiveness in a variety of populations, most recently with children with EF deficits following ABI. One of the challenges of rehabilitation is transferring skills acquired during sessions into everyday life. The literature suggests that CO-OP enables transfer of skills to untrained tasks, but research on transfer following its use with children with ABI is limited. The aims of this study were (1) to determine whether skills acquired during CO-OP transfer to new untrained activities, (2) to study the possible influence of parental involvement in CO-OP on children's attainment of transfer goals, and (3) to determine if the degree of difference between trained and untrained goals is associated with achievement of transfer. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used. Eleven children with EF deficits following ABI took part in the study. At the end of CO-OP intervention, children identified three new goals. These 'transfer' goals were assessed at baseline (immediately post-intervention) and at 2-, 4- and 6-month, using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) and the self- and parent-rated Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Children did not receive any specific intervention during this time. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer and community involvement. RESULTS: At 6 months, GAS indicated that 22 of 32 transfer goals had improved by at least one level. COPM showed a significant increase in (1) child perception of performance and satisfaction for 24/31 and 25/31 goals, respectively, and (2) parent perception of performance and satisfaction for 19/29 of goals. CONCLUSION: This study showed that CO-OP facilitates transfer of acquired skills to new, untrained activities, even after the end of the intervention.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».