MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412775099 · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.70040

Transfer of skills acquired through Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO‐OP) approach in children with executive functions deficits following acquired brain injury

2025· article· en· W4412775099 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clarisse Vezinat, Hélène Lebrault, Hugo Câmara‐Costa, Rose Martini, Mathilde Chevignard

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcquired brain injuryOccupational therapyPsychologyIntervention (counseling)CognitionRehabilitationActivities of daily livingExecutive functionsAffect (linguistics)Cognitive skillDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Children with acquired brain injury (ABI) often have executive function (EF) deficits that affect their ability to carry out activities efficiently. Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) is a cognitive approach to problem-solving. It has demonstrated effectiveness in a variety of populations, most recently with children with EF deficits following ABI. One of the challenges of rehabilitation is transferring skills acquired during sessions into everyday life. The literature suggests that CO-OP enables transfer of skills to untrained tasks, but research on transfer following its use with children with ABI is limited. The aims of this study were (1) to determine whether skills acquired during CO-OP transfer to new untrained activities, (2) to study the possible influence of parental involvement in CO-OP on children's attainment of transfer goals, and (3) to determine if the degree of difference between trained and untrained goals is associated with achievement of transfer. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used. Eleven children with EF deficits following ABI took part in the study. At the end of CO-OP intervention, children identified three new goals. These 'transfer' goals were assessed at baseline (immediately post-intervention) and at 2-, 4- and 6-month, using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) and the self- and parent-rated Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Children did not receive any specific intervention during this time. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer and community involvement. RESULTS: At 6 months, GAS indicated that 22 of 32 transfer goals had improved by at least one level. COPM showed a significant increase in (1) child perception of performance and satisfaction for 24/31 and 25/31 goals, respectively, and (2) parent perception of performance and satisfaction for 19/29 of goals. CONCLUSION: This study showed that CO-OP facilitates transfer of acquired skills to new, untrained activities, even after the end of the intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Occupational Therapy JournalSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207