Sequence, characterization and pharmacological analyses of the adipokinetic hormone receptor in the stick insect, <i>Carausius morosus</i>.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Adipokinetic/hypertrehalosaemic hormone (AKH/HrTH), corazonin (Crz) and the AKH/Crz-related peptide (ACP) are neuropeptides considered homologous to the vertebrate gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). AKH/HrTH are important peptidergic metabolic regulators in insects that are crucial to provide energy during periods of high output mobility or when large amounts of energy-rich substrates are synthesized (for example, during vitellogenesis). AKH functions via a G protein-coupled receptor. Understanding which residue of the peptide (the ligand), activates the receptor with high efficacy is an important step to get insights into the ligand-receptor interaction, which is essential for further research on creating a model of how the ligand behaves in the binding pocket of the receptor. Such data are necessary for the search of non-peptidic mimetic agonists or antagonists in pesticide design. Methods Using bioinformatics and cloning techniques, the complete coding sequence of an AKH receptor was cloned and sequenced from fat body tissues and nervous tissues from the Indian stick insect, Carausius morosus . The resulting Carmo-AKHR was then expressed in a mammalian cell line where it could couple with a Gq protein to mediate calcium mobilization in vitro and cause bioluminescence when activated by a ligand. This receptor assay was used not only with the natural AKH ligands of the stick insect, but also with AKHs from other species and analogs with targeted modifications. A phylogenetic analysis of Carmo-AKHR with the AKH receptors and related receptors from other insects was also carried out. Results The stick insect AKH receptor was successfully cloned and sequenced from fat body and, separately, from nervous tissues. Comparison with known insect AKH, Crz and ACP receptors clearly put the stick insect receptor in the AKH clade and as sister group to other putative Phasmatodean AKH receptors. Moreover, the receptor expressed in mammalian cells was only activated by AKH and not by Crz or ACP indicating a true AKH receptor. Structure-activity studies in an Ala replacement series revealed the ligand residues that are absolutely essential for activating the AKHR: the N-terminal pGlu, Phe 4 , Trp 8 and the C-terminal carboxyamide. Almost as important are Thr 3 and Thr 5 since their replacement reduced the efficacy more than a 100-fold, whereas Thr 10 can be replaced without any real loss of activity. When substituted by Ala at positions 2, 6, 7 and 9, the ligand is somewhat affected with the loss of receptor activation being between 5- to 20-fold. Chain length of the ligand is important for the receptor: an octa- or nonapeptide with the same sequence otherwise as the endogenous stick insect ligand, display a 5- to 10 fold reduced activity. Carefully selected naturally occurring AKH analogs from other insects support the above results. Conclusions The AKH receptor from stick insects (Phasmatodea) cluster together in one clade distinct from other insect AKHRs, although still similar enough to be an insect AKHR, as opposed to the other GnRH-related receptors of insects, such as ACP and Crz receptors. The phylogenetic analyses support the data obtained from other studies involving receptors for AKH, Crz and ACP peptides. The receptor assay results with AKH analogs corroborated most of the results obtained previously using in vivo studies, thus emphasizing that the endogenous AKHs operate through this receptor to cause hypertrehalosemia in the stick insect. It is also clear that certain residues of the AKH peptides are consistently important in their interaction with the cognate AKH receptor, while other amino acid residues are of different importance to AKH receptors on a broad species- or group-specific manner. The previously observed peculiarity that hypertrehalosemia, in response to AKH injection, is only measurable in stick insects ligated below the head is discussed. No explanations for this, however, can be inferred from the current study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».