Sequence, characterization and pharmacological analyses of the adipokinetic hormone receptor in the stick insect, <i>Carausius morosus</i>.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Adipokinetic/hypertrehalosaemic hormone (AKH/HrTH), corazonin (Crz) and the AKH/Crz-related peptide (ACP) are neuropeptides considered homologous to the vertebrate gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). AKH/HrTH are important peptidergic metabolic regulators in insects that are crucial to provide energy during periods of high output mobility or when large amounts of energy-rich substrates are synthesized (for example, during vitellogenesis). AKH functions via a G protein-coupled receptor. Understanding which residue of the peptide (the ligand), activates the receptor with high efficacy is an important step to get insights into the ligand-receptor interaction, which is essential for further research on creating a model of how the ligand behaves in the binding pocket of the receptor. Such data are necessary for the search of non-peptidic mimetic agonists or antagonists in pesticide design. Methods Using bioinformatics and cloning techniques, the complete coding sequence of an AKH receptor was cloned and sequenced from fat body tissues and nervous tissues from the Indian stick insect, Carausius morosus . The resulting Carmo-AKHR was then expressed in a mammalian cell line where it could couple with a Gq protein to mediate calcium mobilization in vitro and cause bioluminescence when activated by a ligand. This receptor assay was used not only with the natural AKH ligands of the stick insect, but also with AKHs from other species and analogs with targeted modifications. A phylogenetic analysis of Carmo-AKHR with the AKH receptors and related receptors from other insects was also carried out. Results The stick insect AKH receptor was successfully cloned and sequenced from fat body and, separately, from nervous tissues. Comparison with known insect AKH, Crz and ACP receptors clearly put the stick insect receptor in the AKH clade and as sister group to other putative Phasmatodean AKH receptors. Moreover, the receptor expressed in mammalian cells was only activated by AKH and not by Crz or ACP indicating a true AKH receptor. Structure-activity studies in an Ala replacement series revealed the ligand residues that are absolutely essential for activating the AKHR: the N-terminal pGlu, Phe 4 , Trp 8 and the C-terminal carboxyamide. Almost as important are Thr 3 and Thr 5 since their replacement reduced the efficacy more than a 100-fold, whereas Thr 10 can be replaced without any real loss of activity. When substituted by Ala at positions 2, 6, 7 and 9, the ligand is somewhat affected with the loss of receptor activation being between 5- to 20-fold. Chain length of the ligand is important for the receptor: an octa- or nonapeptide with the same sequence otherwise as the endogenous stick insect ligand, display a 5- to 10 fold reduced activity. Carefully selected naturally occurring AKH analogs from other insects support the above results. Conclusions The AKH receptor from stick insects (Phasmatodea) cluster together in one clade distinct from other insect AKHRs, although still similar enough to be an insect AKHR, as opposed to the other GnRH-related receptors of insects, such as ACP and Crz receptors. The phylogenetic analyses support the data obtained from other studies involving receptors for AKH, Crz and ACP peptides. The receptor assay results with AKH analogs corroborated most of the results obtained previously using in vivo studies, thus emphasizing that the endogenous AKHs operate through this receptor to cause hypertrehalosemia in the stick insect. It is also clear that certain residues of the AKH peptides are consistently important in their interaction with the cognate AKH receptor, while other amino acid residues are of different importance to AKH receptors on a broad species- or group-specific manner. The previously observed peculiarity that hypertrehalosemia, in response to AKH injection, is only measurable in stick insects ligated below the head is discussed. No explanations for this, however, can be inferred from the current study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".