Knowledge, Perception, and Attitude Toward Voluntary Counseling and Testing for HIV Among Secondary School Students in Iringa Rural District: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for HIV/AIDS is characterized by several key components, including pretest and posttest counseling, as well as the formulation of individualized risk reduction plans. Adolescents, including secondary school students, represent a population particularly vulnerable to HIV infection due to various biological, psychological, and social factors. Objective: The present study aimed to assess the knowledge, perception, attitude, and barriers toward VCT for HIV/AIDS among secondary school students in Iringa Rural District, Tanzania. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Iringa Rural District, targeting secondary school students. A random sampling technique was employed to select the participating schools. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires, which were completed solely by students who voluntarily consented to participate in the study. Data management and analysis were carried out using Epi Info™ 7.2 software. Results: The study involved 127 secondary school students aged 15-25 years from three schools in Iringa Rural District, with 69 (54.3%) female and 58 (45.7%) male participants. All students were aware of the VCT services. The primary source of VCT information was school-based education (92, 33.3%), followed by radio/TV (65, 23.6%), friends/family (46, 16.7%), and magazines (35, 12.7%). Some students also cited health centers, hospitals, and religious seminars (38, 13.8%) as sources. Knowledge of VCT increased with education level, with Form IV students showing the highest awareness (67, 55.4%). Most students understood VCT's main purpose: 88 (50.6%) of them linked it to knowing one's HIV status, 58 (33.3%) to HIV prevention, and 28 (16.1%) to preparing for test results. No misconceptions about VCT's purpose were reported. Attitudes toward HIV testing showed that stigma concerns increased with age, particularly among those aged 17-18 years, where 26 (60.5%) were unwilling to be identified as HIV-positive. Nonetheless, 65 (51.2%) students supported knowing their HIV status and 86 (54.4%) said they would inform others and change their behavior after testing. Key barriers to VCT uptake included fear of stigma (71, 50.6%), lack of confidentiality, insufficient trained personnel, and poor infrastructure. Conclusions: The study found that secondary school students in Iringa Rural District had generally high awareness and positive attitudes toward VCT, mainly informed through schools and media. Awareness increased with education level, but willingness to disclose test results remained low due to stigma and confidentiality concerns. While many students were ready to take responsible actions after testing, barriers such as fear, misinformation, and limited access to services persisted. The study emphasizes the need for improved school-based VCT programs, better-trained staff, community education, and strategies to address stigma and infrastructural gaps.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».