Knowledge, Perception, and Attitude Toward Voluntary Counseling and Testing for HIV Among Secondary School Students in Iringa Rural District: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for HIV/AIDS is characterized by several key components, including pretest and posttest counseling, as well as the formulation of individualized risk reduction plans. Adolescents, including secondary school students, represent a population particularly vulnerable to HIV infection due to various biological, psychological, and social factors. Objective: The present study aimed to assess the knowledge, perception, attitude, and barriers toward VCT for HIV/AIDS among secondary school students in Iringa Rural District, Tanzania. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Iringa Rural District, targeting secondary school students. A random sampling technique was employed to select the participating schools. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires, which were completed solely by students who voluntarily consented to participate in the study. Data management and analysis were carried out using Epi Info™ 7.2 software. Results: The study involved 127 secondary school students aged 15-25 years from three schools in Iringa Rural District, with 69 (54.3%) female and 58 (45.7%) male participants. All students were aware of the VCT services. The primary source of VCT information was school-based education (92, 33.3%), followed by radio/TV (65, 23.6%), friends/family (46, 16.7%), and magazines (35, 12.7%). Some students also cited health centers, hospitals, and religious seminars (38, 13.8%) as sources. Knowledge of VCT increased with education level, with Form IV students showing the highest awareness (67, 55.4%). Most students understood VCT's main purpose: 88 (50.6%) of them linked it to knowing one's HIV status, 58 (33.3%) to HIV prevention, and 28 (16.1%) to preparing for test results. No misconceptions about VCT's purpose were reported. Attitudes toward HIV testing showed that stigma concerns increased with age, particularly among those aged 17-18 years, where 26 (60.5%) were unwilling to be identified as HIV-positive. Nonetheless, 65 (51.2%) students supported knowing their HIV status and 86 (54.4%) said they would inform others and change their behavior after testing. Key barriers to VCT uptake included fear of stigma (71, 50.6%), lack of confidentiality, insufficient trained personnel, and poor infrastructure. Conclusions: The study found that secondary school students in Iringa Rural District had generally high awareness and positive attitudes toward VCT, mainly informed through schools and media. Awareness increased with education level, but willingness to disclose test results remained low due to stigma and confidentiality concerns. While many students were ready to take responsible actions after testing, barriers such as fear, misinformation, and limited access to services persisted. The study emphasizes the need for improved school-based VCT programs, better-trained staff, community education, and strategies to address stigma and infrastructural gaps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".