MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413026388 · doi:10.2196/66739

Knowledge, Perception, and Attitude Toward Voluntary Counseling and Testing for HIV Among Secondary School Students in Iringa Rural District: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4413026388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maiko Charles Mkwambe, Shakilu Jumanne, Deng You-ping

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyPreprintVoluntary counseling and testingHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychologyDescriptive statisticsPerceptionDescriptive researchMedical educationMedicineEnvironmental healthFamily medicinePopulationSociologyStatisticsHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for HIV/AIDS is characterized by several key components, including pretest and posttest counseling, as well as the formulation of individualized risk reduction plans. Adolescents, including secondary school students, represent a population particularly vulnerable to HIV infection due to various biological, psychological, and social factors. Objective: The present study aimed to assess the knowledge, perception, attitude, and barriers toward VCT for HIV/AIDS among secondary school students in Iringa Rural District, Tanzania. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Iringa Rural District, targeting secondary school students. A random sampling technique was employed to select the participating schools. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires, which were completed solely by students who voluntarily consented to participate in the study. Data management and analysis were carried out using Epi Info™ 7.2 software. Results: The study involved 127 secondary school students aged 15-25 years from three schools in Iringa Rural District, with 69 (54.3%) female and 58 (45.7%) male participants. All students were aware of the VCT services. The primary source of VCT information was school-based education (92, 33.3%), followed by radio/TV (65, 23.6%), friends/family (46, 16.7%), and magazines (35, 12.7%). Some students also cited health centers, hospitals, and religious seminars (38, 13.8%) as sources. Knowledge of VCT increased with education level, with Form IV students showing the highest awareness (67, 55.4%). Most students understood VCT's main purpose: 88 (50.6%) of them linked it to knowing one's HIV status, 58 (33.3%) to HIV prevention, and 28 (16.1%) to preparing for test results. No misconceptions about VCT's purpose were reported. Attitudes toward HIV testing showed that stigma concerns increased with age, particularly among those aged 17-18 years, where 26 (60.5%) were unwilling to be identified as HIV-positive. Nonetheless, 65 (51.2%) students supported knowing their HIV status and 86 (54.4%) said they would inform others and change their behavior after testing. Key barriers to VCT uptake included fear of stigma (71, 50.6%), lack of confidentiality, insufficient trained personnel, and poor infrastructure. Conclusions: The study found that secondary school students in Iringa Rural District had generally high awareness and positive attitudes toward VCT, mainly informed through schools and media. Awareness increased with education level, but willingness to disclose test results remained low due to stigma and confidentiality concerns. While many students were ready to take responsible actions after testing, barriers such as fear, misinformation, and limited access to services persisted. The study emphasizes the need for improved school-based VCT programs, better-trained staff, community education, and strategies to address stigma and infrastructural gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFrench-language works237,207