Affective disorders accompanied by cognitive disorders in inpatients with cardiovascular diseases: a clinical and pathopsychological study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The multimorbidity of affective, cognitive, and cardiovascular diseases is an urgent issue of the contemporary medicine due to their severity, resistance to therapy, social maladjustment, and low quality of life. Common pathogenetic mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction and disorders of the frontal and subcortical connections, enhance these conditions, increasing the risks of dementia and mortality. AIM: To study the clinical and psychopathological structure of affective disorders and comorbid cognitive disorders in inpatients with cardiovascular diseases in various age groups. METHODS: An observational, single-center study was conducted from January 2023 to June 2024 at the University Clinic of the Russian University of Medicine. The study involved 121 patients with cardiovascular diseases and non-psychotic mental disorders, including 47 (38.8%) with comorbid affective and cognitive disorders. The patients were divided into three age groups, 45–59, 60–74, and 75–90 years. Clinical psychopathological and psychometric (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and neuropsychological methods (clock drawing test, Luria’s method) were used. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t-test. RESULTS: In 85.1% of patients, we detected organic emotional disorders, mainly with alarming symptoms. Significant differences in the clinical structure of affective disorders between the groups indicate age-related differences (p = 0.045). Cognitive disorders (visual and constructional praxis, attention, memory, abstract thinking) are associated with vascular changes and dysfunction of the frontal lobes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were in the range of 18–27; the average score in the 45–59 group (24.9 ± 0.3) was higher compared to the 60–74 (23.5 ± 0.2; p 0.05) and 75–90 groups (23.4 ± 0.3; p 0.05). Moderate cognitive disorders were detected in 55.3% of cases, severe cognitive disorders were detected in 19.2% of cases, and 25.5% of cases were within the normal range. Subjective cognitive complaints related to the risk of dementia were not confirmed by tests in 27.6% of cases. Attention and abstract thinking disorders increased with age (p 0.05); whereas speech disorders showed no significant differences (p 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the importance of early diagnosis and an interdisciplinary approach to multimorbid conditions and a qualitative analysis of the psychopathological and pathopsychological structure of affective and cognitive disorders in cardiovascular cases. The limitation is the small sample size, requiring further research on a larger sample of patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».