COVID-19 pandemic and access to mental healthcare: A qualitative study of the experiences of mental healthcare providers and caregivers in Ghana
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic created enormous additional demand for already weak mental health systems in many countries that were severely impacted, as evidence showed that new mental health disorders were triggered while those with pre-existing mental health conditions worsened. Yet, we know little about the extent to which the pandemic impacted the provision of care by frontline mental health care providers and access to mental health care among caregivers. This study describes the experiences of frontline mental health care providers and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana. A qualitative study employing a phenomenological approach and semi-structured interview methods was undertaken among caregivers of people living with any kind of mental illness and mental health care providers. We used a purposive sampling technique to select study participants who were available and consented to share their experiences. An interview guide facilitated the data collection process. We used an inductive approach through open coding to generate codes. We then grouped codes into emergent categories and further into themes of experiences of accessing mental health services by users and provision of mental health services by providers. Our analysis identified six themes regarding frontline mental health care providers' experiences at the primary health care level during the COVID-19 pandemic: a) interrupted home visits b) lack of government support c) lack of medication d) low clinic attendance e) disruptions in service delivery f) extended medication supply and g) patient aggression and attacks. Four themes emerged that characterize the experiences of caregivers of people living with mental health conditions, namely a) denial and withdrawal of facility-based care b) medication refill challenges c) disruption in outreach and follow-up calls and d) isolation and limited community support. The study highlights the challenges experienced by frontline mental health care providers and caregivers of people living with mental health conditions. It brought to light specific gaps that require urgent attention for people living with mental health conditions, their caregivers, and frontline workers. Institutional additional support systems to ensure fewer disruptions and address access-based gaps through outreach and community support would help improve their experiences in future pandemics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».