Integrated Assessment of Groundwater Quality Using Water Quality Indices, Geospatial Analysis, and Neural Networks in a Rural Hungarian Settlement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the present study, the changes in the groundwater quality in a Hungarian settlement, Báránd, were examined, nine years after the construction of a sewerage network. The sewerage network in the study area was completed in 2014, with a household connection rate exceeding 97% in 2023. In the summer of 2023, water samples were taken from 37 dug groundwater wells. Changes in the water quality were assessed using three water quality indicators (the Water Quality Index (WQI), Contamination degree (Cd), and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI)) and geographic information (GIS), data visualization systems, and artificial intelligence (AI). During the evaluation of the quality of the groundwater, eight water chemical parameters were used (pH, EC, NH4+, NO2−, NO3−, PO43−, COD, Na+). Based on interpolated maps and water quality indices, it was established that while an increasing portion of the area exhibits adequate or good water quality compared to the pre-sewerage period, a deterioration has occurred relative to recent years. Even nine years after the sewerage network construction, elevated concentrations of inorganic nitrogen forms and organic matter persist, indicating the continued presence of accumulated pollutants, as confirmed by all three water quality indicators to varying degrees and spatial patterns. The interactive data visualization and cloud-based sharing of the data of the water quality geodatabase were made freely available with the help of Tableau Public. A Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to predict the groundwater quality, estimating the water quality statuses of three water quality indicators based on water chemistry parameters. The results showed that the applied training algorithms and activation functions proved to be the most effective in the case of different network structures. The most accurate prediction of the WQI and CCME WQI indicators was provided by the Bayesian control algorithm (trainbr), which achieved the lowest mean-squared error (RMSEWQI = 0.1205, RMSECCME WQI = 0.1305) and the highest determination coefficient (R2WQI = 0.9916, R2CCME WQI = 0.9838). For the Cd index, the accuracy of the model was lower (RMSE = 0.1621, R2 = 0.9714), suggesting that this indicator is more difficult to predict. With regard to our study, it should be emphasized that data visualization is a particularly practical tool for the post-processing of spatial monitoring data, as it is suitable for displaying information in an intuitive, visual form, for discovering spatial patterns and relationships, and for performing real-time analyses. AI is expected to further increase visualization efficiency in the future, enabling the rapid processing of large amounts of data and spatial databases, as well as the identification of complex patterns.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».