Integrated Assessment of Groundwater Quality Using Water Quality Indices, Geospatial Analysis, and Neural Networks in a Rural Hungarian Settlement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, the changes in the groundwater quality in a Hungarian settlement, Báránd, were examined, nine years after the construction of a sewerage network. The sewerage network in the study area was completed in 2014, with a household connection rate exceeding 97% in 2023. In the summer of 2023, water samples were taken from 37 dug groundwater wells. Changes in the water quality were assessed using three water quality indicators (the Water Quality Index (WQI), Contamination degree (Cd), and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI)) and geographic information (GIS), data visualization systems, and artificial intelligence (AI). During the evaluation of the quality of the groundwater, eight water chemical parameters were used (pH, EC, NH4+, NO2−, NO3−, PO43−, COD, Na+). Based on interpolated maps and water quality indices, it was established that while an increasing portion of the area exhibits adequate or good water quality compared to the pre-sewerage period, a deterioration has occurred relative to recent years. Even nine years after the sewerage network construction, elevated concentrations of inorganic nitrogen forms and organic matter persist, indicating the continued presence of accumulated pollutants, as confirmed by all three water quality indicators to varying degrees and spatial patterns. The interactive data visualization and cloud-based sharing of the data of the water quality geodatabase were made freely available with the help of Tableau Public. A Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to predict the groundwater quality, estimating the water quality statuses of three water quality indicators based on water chemistry parameters. The results showed that the applied training algorithms and activation functions proved to be the most effective in the case of different network structures. The most accurate prediction of the WQI and CCME WQI indicators was provided by the Bayesian control algorithm (trainbr), which achieved the lowest mean-squared error (RMSEWQI = 0.1205, RMSECCME WQI = 0.1305) and the highest determination coefficient (R2WQI = 0.9916, R2CCME WQI = 0.9838). For the Cd index, the accuracy of the model was lower (RMSE = 0.1621, R2 = 0.9714), suggesting that this indicator is more difficult to predict. With regard to our study, it should be emphasized that data visualization is a particularly practical tool for the post-processing of spatial monitoring data, as it is suitable for displaying information in an intuitive, visual form, for discovering spatial patterns and relationships, and for performing real-time analyses. AI is expected to further increase visualization efficiency in the future, enabling the rapid processing of large amounts of data and spatial databases, as well as the identification of complex patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".