MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4413230287 · doi:10.58682/jsbe.45.1/ippy8827

Efficacy of various agro-chemicals on the populations of litter cryptostigmatids in undisturbed grassland ecosystems

2025· article· en· W4413230287 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
ABDUL QAHAR QARLUQ

Notice bibliographique

RevueJOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueForest Insect Ecology and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCarbofuranPopulationBifenthrinSoil mesofaunaAgronomyPhorateBiologyToxicologySoil biologyPesticideEcologySoil water

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The study investigated the impact of agro-chemicals on the abundance of litter cryptostigmata in an undisturbed grassland habitat characterized by a thick mat of grass. The agrochemicals examined included insecticides (phorate, carbofuran, and chlorpyrifos), an acaricide (dicofol), a fungicide (carbendazim), as well as neem cake and water-soluble fertilizers applied at a rate of 50:40:25 kg NPK per hectare. Among the treated plots, carbofuran demonstrated significantly higher toxicity to Cryptostigmata in the litter samples compared to the control. The order of toxicity to Cryptostigmata was carbofuran = fertilizer = carbendazim = neem cake = dicofol = chlorpyriphos = phorate < control. However, maximum reduction of Cryptostigmata was observed in chlorpyriphos-treated plots 10 days after treatments. Key Words: Cryptostigmata, Insecticide, Fungicide, Acaricide, Fertilizers, Neemcake References Andres, P. and Domene, X., 2005. Ecotoxicological and fertilizing effects of dewatered, composted and dry sewage sludge on soil mesofauna: A TME experiment. Ecotoxicology, pp. 545-557. Banashree Medhi, 2024.Impact of agrochemicals on the population of litter entomobryid collembolans in th grassland ecosystem.J.Soil Biol.Ecol.,44(1);84-92.(doi:10.58682/jsbe.44.1/ITVL7329) Behan, B., 1972. The effects of urea on acarina and other arthropods in Quebec black spruce (Picea mariana Mill.) humus, M.Sc. Thesis, Mc Gill Univ, Montreal, pp. 175. Bhattacharya, J. and Bhattacharya, T., 1987. Changes in the abundance of soil micro-arthropods in two contrasting sites in the Durgapur industrial area. J.Soil Biol.Ecol., 7(2): 110-121. Carey, A.M., Dindal, D.L. and Leaf, A.L., 1971. Responses of micro-arthropod populations to potassium fertilization and /or irrigation. Am.Soc.Agron.Annual meeting, agronomy abstracts: 119. Cockfield, S.D. and Potter, D.A., 1983. Short-term effects of insecticidal applications on predacious arthropods and oribatid mites in Kentucky blue grass turf. Environ. Entomol., 12(12): 1260-1264. Cole, L., Buckland, S.M. and Bardgett, R.D., 2008. Influence of disturbance and nitrogen addition on plant and soil animal diversity in Grassland. Soil. Biol.Biochem., 40: 505-514. Colinas, C., Ingham, E. and Molina, R., 1994. Population responses of target and non- target forest soil organisms to selected biocides. Soil Bio. Biochem., 26(1): 41-47. Endlweber, K., Schadler, M. and Scheu, S., 2006. Effects of foliar and soil insecticide applications on the collembolan community of an early set-aside arable field. Applied Soil Ecology, 31: 136-146. Everts, J.W., Aukema, B., Hengeveld, R. and Koeman, J.H., 1989. Side effects of pesticides on ground-dwelling predatory arthropods in arable ecosystems. Environ Pollut., 59(3): 203-25. Forster, B., Garcia, M., Francimari, O. and Rombke, J., 2006. Effects of carbendazim and lambda-cyhalothrin on soil invertebrates and leaf litter decomposition in semi-field and field tests under tropical conditions (Amazonia, Brazil). European Journal of Soil Biology, 42: 171–179. Frampton, G.K. and van den Brink, P.J., 2007. Collembola and macro-arthropod community responses to carbamate, organo-phosphatic and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides: direct and indirect effects. Environ Pollut., 147(1): 14-25. Garcia, M., 2004. Effects of pesticides on soil fauna: Development of ecotoxicological test methods for tropical regions zentrum tur ent wicklung storschung center for development Research. Ecology and Development Series No .19. University of Bonn. Kong, W.D., Zhu, Y.G., Fu, B.J., Han, X.Z., Zhang, L. and He, J.Z., 2008. Effect of long- term application of chemical fertilizers on microbial biomass and functional diversity of a black soil. Pedosphere, 18(6): 801-808. Krogh, P.H., 1991. Perturbation of the soil micro-arthropod community with the pesticides benomyl and isofenphos population changes. Pedobiologia, 35(2): 71-78. Kumar, K. and Agarwal, R.A., 1983. Systemic granular insecticides and rhizosphere fauna of cotton. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 3(1): 13-21. Kumar,N.G., Avinash,T.G. and Nirmala,P.,2024.The impact of farmyard manure and fertilizer application rates on soil mesofauna in both monoculture and crop rotation systems. J.SoilBiol.Ecol., 44(1):93-99 (doi:10.58682/jsbe.44.1/IJLL7617). Majumdar, A. and Roy, S., 1991.Effect of a Tridemorph fungicide- calaxin on collembolan and fungal population of undisturbed grassland at Burdwan. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 11(1): 24-29. Marshal, V.G., 1977. Effects of manures and fertilizers on soil fauna: A Review CAB special publication, 3: 79. Ngangom Umadevi, 2024. Impact of higher dose of soil nutrient application on the soil mesofauna in the maize cropping system. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 44(1):48-57. (doi:10.58682/JSBE.44.1/SVKI8099) Pimental, D., 1992. Forward. In: Ecological processes in agro- ecosystems, (Eds: M. Shiyomi, E. Yano, H. Koizumi, D.A. Andow and N. Hokyo), Japan. 1-2 pp. Rashmi, M.A., 2009. Role of agrochemicals on soil faunal composition in grassland ecosystem. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, pp. 125 127. Sarath, B.B. and Gupta, G.P., 1986. Effect of systemic insecticides on the population of soil arthropods in cotton field. J.Soil Biol. Ecol., 6(6): 32-41. Singh, R. and Gupta, G.P., 1993. Impact of insecticidal schedules on soil arthropods in cotton ecosystem. J.Soil Biol. Ecol., 13(1): 50-56. Stark, J.D., 1992. Comparison of the impact of neem seed kernel extract formulation, Margosan- O and chlorpyriphos on non-target invertebrates inhabiting turf grass. Pesticide Sci., 36(3): 293-299. Sundararaj, N., Nagaraju, S., Venkataramu, M. N. and Jagannath, M. K., 1972. Design and Analysis of field experiments, UAS, Bangalore, pp. 419. Tadros,M.S. and Carey, W.F., 1982.Effect of a single application of chlorpyriphos on soil micro-arthropods existing in a turf plot, with reference to existing residues of chlordane, Dursban and DDT (Eds: Griffiths, D.A. and Bowman, C.E.), Acarology 2, Ellis Horwood Limited, England, pp. 941-950. Tomlin, A.D., 1977. Toxicity of soil applications of the fungicide benomyl and two analogues to three species of Collembola. Can.Ent., 109: 1619- 1620. Yang, X., Warren, M. and Zou, X., 2007.Fertilization responses of soil litter fauna and litter quantity, quality, and turnover in low and high elevation forests of Puerto Rico. Applied Soil Ecology, 37: 63-71. Yen, J.H., Chang, J.S., Huang, P.J. and Wang, Y.S., 2009. Effects of fungicides triadimefon and propiconazole on soil bacterial communities. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B., 44: 681-689

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,253

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGYMême sujetForest Insect Ecology and ManagementTravaux en français237 207