The effect of different doses of fertilizers, based on soil testing and crop response, on the yield of cabbage crop in relation to the introduced native soil mesofauna.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present field experiment focused on the effects of applying inorganic fertilizers and farm yard manure based on soil testing and crop response (STCR) on the introduced native soil mesofauna in the cabbage cropping system. The mean abundance of soil mesofauna was significantly high in STCR 30q ha-1 integrated with 59:74:109 Kg NPK/ha +25t FYM/ha +2 kg/plot mesofauna rich soil treatment (17.67 mesofauna /400 g soil) and was on par with rest of the treatments except LMH (167:100:163KgNPK/ha +25t FYM/ha) +no mesofauna rich soil (13.00 mesofauna/400 g soil), Control +2kg/plot mesofauna rich soil (11.89 mesofauna /400g soil) and STCR 30q ha-1 Integrated (59:74:109 Kg NPK/ha +25 t FYM/ha) + no mesofauna rich soil (11.33 mesofauna/ 400 g soil). The latter treatment recorded the least soil mesofauna. The introduced native soil mesofauna multiplied more in reduced fertilizer doses with the addition of FYM treatments compared to only fertilizer-applied treatment. Soil mesofauna was significantly more during 45 days after treatment and reduced significantly at the harvesting stage. Key words: STCR, fertilizer, farm yard manure, introduced native soil mesofauna, cabbage References Abhilasha, C.R. and Kumar, N.G., 2021.Impact of soil microbial biomass carbon on the activity of soil mesofauna in baby corn ecosystem. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 41(2):25-32. Andres, P. and Domene, X., 2005. Ecotoxicological and fertilizing effects of dewatered, composted and dry sewage sludge on soil mesofauna: A TME experiment. Ecotoxicology, pp. 545-557. Banashree Medhi, 2024.Impact of agrochemicals on the population of litter entomobryid collembolans in th grassland ecosystem. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 44(1); 84-92. Behan, B., 1972. The effects of urea on acarina and other arthropods in Quebec black spruce (Picea mariana Mill.) humus, M.Sc. Thesis, Mc Gill Univ, Montreal, pp. 175. Bhattacharya, J. and Bhattacharya, T., 1987. Changes in the abundance of soil micro-arthropods in two contrasting sites in the Durgapur industrial area. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 7(2): 110-121. Chimmalagi, S.S., Kumar, N.G. and Avinash, T.G., 2016.Interaction between soil mesofauna, soil fertility and microbial activity in soybean ecosystem. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 36(1):85-90. Cockfield, S.D. and Potter, D.A., 1983. Short-term effects of insecticidal applications on predacious arthropods and oribatid mites in Kentucky blue grass turf. Environ. Entomol., 12(12): 1260-1264. Cole, L., Buckland, S.M. and Bardgett, R.D., 2008. Influence of disturbance and nitrogen addition on plant and soil animal diversity in Grassland. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 40: 505- 514. Colinas, C., Ingham, E. and Molina, R., 1994. Population responses of target and non- target forest soil organisms to selected biocides. Soil Bio. Biochem., 26(1): 41-47. Forster, B., Garcia, M., Francimari, O. and Rombke, J., 2006. Effects of carbendazim and lambda-cyhalothrin on soil invertebrates and leaf litter decomposition in semi-field and field tests under tropical conditions (Amazonia, Brazil). European Journal of Soil Biology, 42: 171–179. Frampton, G.K. and van den Brink, P.J., 2007. Collembola and macroarthropod community responses to carbamate, organo-phosphatic and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides: direct and indirect effects. Environ Pollut., 147(1): 14-25. Garcia, M., 2004. Effects of pesticides on soil fauna: Development of ecotoxicological test methods for tropical regions zentrum tur ent wicklung storschung center for Development Research. Ecology and Development Series No .19. University of Bonn. Golive Prashanti., 2014. Impact of crop rotation on soil fauna in organic farming ecosystem.M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Uni. Agric. Sci., Bangalore, p. 154. Golive Prashanti, Kumar, N.G. and Gurumurthy, H., 2017. Influence of chemical parameters and microbial biomass C and N on soil mesofauna in organic farming ecosystem. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 37(1):47-54. Kong, W.D., Zhu, Y.G., Fu, B.J., Han, X.Z., Zhang, L. and He, J.Z., 2008. Effect of long-term application of chemical fertilizers on microbial biomass and functional diversity of a black soil. Pedosphere, 18(6): 801-808. Krogh, P.H., 1991. Perturbation of the soil micro-arthropod community with the pesticides benomyl and isofenphos population changes. Pedobiologia, 35(2): 71-78. Kumar, K. and Agarwal, R.A., 1983. Systemic granular insecticides and rhizosphere fauna of cotton. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 3(1): 13-21. Kumar, N.G., Avinash, T.G. and Nirmala, P., 2024 a. The impact of farmyard manure and fertilizer application rates on soil mesofauna in both monoculture and crop rotation systems. J. Soil Biol. Ecol., 44(1);93-99. (doi:10.58682/JSBE.44.1/IJLL7617) Kumar, N.G., Avinash, T.G. and Nirmala, P., 2024b.The influence of fertilizer dosage application, guided by soil testing and crop response, on the target yield in relation to the introduced native soil mesofauna.J.SoilBiol.Ecol.,44(2);59-67. Mahesh, H.M. and Kumar, N.G., 2020.The abundance of soil mesofauna in cropping and non- cropping seasons in organically cultivated fodder maize ecosystem. J. Soil. Biol. Ecol., 40(1):21-29. Majumdar, A. and Roy, S., 1991.Effect of a Tridemorph fungicide- calaxin on collembolan and fungal population of undisturbed grassland at Burdwan. J.Soil Biol. Ecol., 11(1): 24-29. Marshal, V.G., 1977. Effects of manures and fertilizers on soil fauna: A Review CAB special publication, 3: 79. Narasareddy, G., 2012.Studies on the inter-relationship between soil mesofauna and nematodes in organic farming system.M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Uni. Agric. Sci., Bangalore, p. 158. Ngangom Umadevi, 2024.Impact of higher dose of soil nutrient application on the soil mesofauna in the maize cropping system. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 44(1):48-57. Pimental, D., 1992. Forward. In: Ecological processes in agro- ecosystems, (Eds: M. Shiyomi, E. Yano, H. Koizumi, D.A. Andow and N. Hokyo), Japan. 1-2 pp. Prasanna, P.M. and Kumar, N.G., 2021.Influence of farmyard manure, vermicompost and fertilizers on the activity of soil mesofauna and soil organic carbon in the soybean cropping system. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 41(2):33-42. Rashmi, M.A., 2009. Role of agrochemicals on soil faunal composition in grassland ecosystem. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, pp. 125 127. Sarath, B.B. and Gupta, G.P., 1986. Effect of systemic insecticides on the population of soil arthropods in cotton field. J.Soil Biol. Ecol., 6(6): 32-41. Shivappa Agadi, Kumar, N.G. and Shrinath Chimmalagi, S., 2018. Soil mesofaunal composition in response to different nutrient applications in sunflower ecosystem. J. Soil Biol.Ecol., 38:161-168. Singh, R. and Gupta, G.P., 1993. Impact of insecticidal schedules on soil arthropods in cotton ecosystem. J.Soil Biol. Ecol., 13(1): 50-56. Stark, J.D., 1992. Comparison of the impact of neem seed kernel extract formulation, Margosan- O and chlorpyriphos on non-target invertebrates inhabiting turf grass. Pesticide Sci., 36(3): 293-299. Sundararaj, N., Nagaraju, S., Venkataramu, M.N. and Jagannath, M. K., 1972. Design and Analysis of field experiments, UAS, Bangalore, pp. 419. Tadros, M.S. and Carey, W.F., 1982.Effect of a single application of chlorpyriphos on soil micro-arthropods existing in a turf plot, with reference to existing residues of chlordane, Dursban and DDT (Eds: Griffiths, D.A. and Bowman,C.E.), Acarology 2, Ellis Horwood Limited, England, pp. 941-950. Tomlin, A.D., 1977. Toxicity of soil applications of the fungicide benomyl and two analogues to three species of Collembola. Can. Ent., 109: 1619- 1620. Virupaksha, B. G., 2011. Development of conservation practices for below ground biodiversity in soybean ecosystem. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Uni. Agric. Sci., Bangalore, p. 191. Yang, X., Warren, M. and Zou, X., 2007.Fertilization responses of soil litter fauna and litter quantity, quality, and turnover in low and high elevation forests of Puerto Rico. Applied Soil Ecology, 37: 63-71. Yen, J.H., Chang, J.S., Huang, P.J. and Wang, Y.S., 2009. Effects of fungicides triadimefon and propiconazole on soil bacterial communities. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B., 44: 681-689.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».