Behavioral flexibility is related to exploration, but not boldness, persistence or motor diversity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Behavioral flexibility, the ability to change behavior when circumstances change based on learning from previous experience, is thought to play an important role in a species' ability to successfully adapt to new environments and expand its geographic range. However, behavioral flexibility is rarely directly tested at the individual level. This limits our ability to determine how it relates to other traits, such as exploration or persistence, that might also influence individual responses to novel circumstances. Without this information, we lack the power to predict which traits facilitate a species' ability to adapt behavior to new environments. We use great-tailed grackles (a bird species; hereafter “grackles”) as a model to investigate this question because they have rapidly expanded their range into North America over the past 140 years. We evaluated whether grackle behavioral flexibility (measured as color reversal learning) correlated with individual differences in the exploration of new environments and novel objects, boldness towards known and novel threats, as well as persistence and motor diversity in accessing a novel food source. We determined that exploration of a novel environment across two time points and persistence when interacting with several different novel apparatuses were repeatable in individual grackles. There was no relationship between exploration or persistence and the two components of flexibility - the rate of learning to prefer a color option in the reversal learning task, and the rate of deviating from a preferred option. However, grackles that underwent serial reversal training to experimentally increase behavioral flexibility were more exploratory in that they spent more time in close proximity to the novel environment relative to control individuals. This indicates that, the more an individual investigated a novel apparatus, the more it was able to potentially learn and update its knowledge of current reward contingencies to adapt behavior accordingly. Our findings improve our understanding of the traits that are linked with flexibility in a highly adaptable species. We highlight the importance of using multiple different methods for measuring boldness and exploration to evaluate consistency of performance and therefore the methodological validity. We also show a link between exploration and behavioral flexibility that could facilitate adaptation to novel environmental changes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».