MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413284071 · doi:10.24072/pcjournal.593

Behavioral flexibility is related to exploration, but not boldness, persistence or motor diversity

2025· article· en· W4413284071 on OpenAlexaff
Kelsey McCune, Dieter Lukas, Maggie MacPherson, Corina Logan

Bibliographic record

VenuePeer Community Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State UniversityMax-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre AnthropologieLeverhulme TrustArizona State University
KeywordsBoldnessPersistence (discontinuity)Flexibility (engineering)Diversity (politics)PsychologyEcologyCognitive psychologyBiologySocial psychologyEngineeringPersonalitySociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Behavioral flexibility, the ability to change behavior when circumstances change based on learning from previous experience, is thought to play an important role in a species' ability to successfully adapt to new environments and expand its geographic range. However, behavioral flexibility is rarely directly tested at the individual level. This limits our ability to determine how it relates to other traits, such as exploration or persistence, that might also influence individual responses to novel circumstances. Without this information, we lack the power to predict which traits facilitate a species' ability to adapt behavior to new environments. We use great-tailed grackles (a bird species; hereafter “grackles”) as a model to investigate this question because they have rapidly expanded their range into North America over the past 140 years. We evaluated whether grackle behavioral flexibility (measured as color reversal learning) correlated with individual differences in the exploration of new environments and novel objects, boldness towards known and novel threats, as well as persistence and motor diversity in accessing a novel food source. We determined that exploration of a novel environment across two time points and persistence when interacting with several different novel apparatuses were repeatable in individual grackles. There was no relationship between exploration or persistence and the two components of flexibility - the rate of learning to prefer a color option in the reversal learning task, and the rate of deviating from a preferred option. However, grackles that underwent serial reversal training to experimentally increase behavioral flexibility were more exploratory in that they spent more time in close proximity to the novel environment relative to control individuals. This indicates that, the more an individual investigated a novel apparatus, the more it was able to potentially learn and update its knowledge of current reward contingencies to adapt behavior accordingly. Our findings improve our understanding of the traits that are linked with flexibility in a highly adaptable species. We highlight the importance of using multiple different methods for measuring boldness and exploration to evaluate consistency of performance and therefore the methodological validity. We also show a link between exploration and behavioral flexibility that could facilitate adaptation to novel environmental changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeer Community JournalSame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207