Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: To support the success of integrated care, it must be underpinned by integrated commissioning. This workshop introduces the Integrated System Commissioning Program, drawing on a decade of experience in measuring and driving system commissioning improvements in Canada, England, and Australia. Participants will gain insights into best practices, learn from real-world examples, and explore strategies to enhance their own commissioning efforts, ultimately leading to more effective and cohesive integrated care delivery systems. Audience: This workshop is designed for senior healthcare managers and executive decision-makers responsible for commissioning healthcare at national, provincial, state, or regional levels. It is particularly relevant for those looking to enhance their strategic planning and implementation skills, and who are committed to driving improvements in integrated care through effective system commissioning. Approach: This workshop is designed to be highly interactive, fostering engagement and active participation from attendees. The session will combine informative presentations with hands-on activities to ensure a comprehensive understanding and practical application of system commissioning concepts, essential for successful integrated care. The structure of the session is:. The Case for Change (5 mins)- Why System Commissioning is so vital for Integrated Care2. The Evolution of System Commissioning in Australia (0 mins)- Learnings from the Hunter New England Central Coast Primary Health Network System Commissioning story- Learnings from introducing system commissioning to the Manitoba Province of Canada3. Introducing the Integrated System Commissioning Program (5 mins)- Overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Maturity Assessment Tool- Overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Education Platform4. Applying System Commissioning in your region (45 mins)- An interactive facilitated workshop exploring how System Commissioning concepts can be applied in the participant regions5. Wrap up and sharing of learnings (5 mins)- Summary of key takeaways and participant insights6. Action Learning (0 mins)- Identifying opportunities for Integrated Care System Commissioning action learning and next steps Outcomes: By the end of this workshop, participants will:- Understand the importance of system commissioning: Gain a clear understanding of why integrated commissioning is crucial for the success of integrated care systems.- Learn from real-world examples: Benefit from insights and lessons learned from system commissioning initiatives in Australia and Canada, providing practical knowledge that can be applied in their regions.- Familiarize with the Integrated System Commissioning Program: Obtain an overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Maturity Assessment Tool and the Education Platform, equipping them with resources to assess and enhance their commissioning practices.- Develop practical application strategies: Through interactive sessions, participants will explore how to apply system commissioning concepts in their specific regional contexts, fostering collaborative problem-solving and strategic planning.- Identify opportunities for action learning: Recognize and outline opportunities for ongoing action learning in system commissioning, ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation in their healthcare systems.- Network and share insights: Engage with peers, share experiences, and build a network of professionals committed to advancing integrated care through effective system commissioning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,044 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».