Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: To support the success of integrated care, it must be underpinned by integrated commissioning. This workshop introduces the Integrated System Commissioning Program, drawing on a decade of experience in measuring and driving system commissioning improvements in Canada, England, and Australia. Participants will gain insights into best practices, learn from real-world examples, and explore strategies to enhance their own commissioning efforts, ultimately leading to more effective and cohesive integrated care delivery systems. Audience: This workshop is designed for senior healthcare managers and executive decision-makers responsible for commissioning healthcare at national, provincial, state, or regional levels. It is particularly relevant for those looking to enhance their strategic planning and implementation skills, and who are committed to driving improvements in integrated care through effective system commissioning. Approach: This workshop is designed to be highly interactive, fostering engagement and active participation from attendees. The session will combine informative presentations with hands-on activities to ensure a comprehensive understanding and practical application of system commissioning concepts, essential for successful integrated care. The structure of the session is:. The Case for Change (5 mins)- Why System Commissioning is so vital for Integrated Care2. The Evolution of System Commissioning in Australia (0 mins)- Learnings from the Hunter New England Central Coast Primary Health Network System Commissioning story- Learnings from introducing system commissioning to the Manitoba Province of Canada3. Introducing the Integrated System Commissioning Program (5 mins)- Overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Maturity Assessment Tool- Overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Education Platform4. Applying System Commissioning in your region (45 mins)- An interactive facilitated workshop exploring how System Commissioning concepts can be applied in the participant regions5. Wrap up and sharing of learnings (5 mins)- Summary of key takeaways and participant insights6. Action Learning (0 mins)- Identifying opportunities for Integrated Care System Commissioning action learning and next steps Outcomes: By the end of this workshop, participants will:- Understand the importance of system commissioning: Gain a clear understanding of why integrated commissioning is crucial for the success of integrated care systems.- Learn from real-world examples: Benefit from insights and lessons learned from system commissioning initiatives in Australia and Canada, providing practical knowledge that can be applied in their regions.- Familiarize with the Integrated System Commissioning Program: Obtain an overview of the Integrated System Commissioning Maturity Assessment Tool and the Education Platform, equipping them with resources to assess and enhance their commissioning practices.- Develop practical application strategies: Through interactive sessions, participants will explore how to apply system commissioning concepts in their specific regional contexts, fostering collaborative problem-solving and strategic planning.- Identify opportunities for action learning: Recognize and outline opportunities for ongoing action learning in system commissioning, ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation in their healthcare systems.- Network and share insights: Engage with peers, share experiences, and build a network of professionals committed to advancing integrated care through effective system commissioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".