Daily Dietary Sodium Intake Among Clinical Trial Participants Recruited From a University Health System or a Federally Qualified Health Center: Secondary Analysis of Baseline Participant Characteristics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials often prioritize recruitment based on broad demographic factors. This approach may overlook the influence of community context and health-related social needs on health behaviors, including sodium intake, a key modifiable risk factor for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of enrollment site, sociodemographic factors, and health-related social needs on baseline dietary sodium intake among participants in a mobile health clinical trial aimed at lowering blood pressure. Methods: The myBPmyLife study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating a mobile health intervention to lower blood pressure through increased physical activity and lower sodium food choices. Participants with hypertension were recruited from a university health system and a federally qualified health center (FQHC). All participants completed a validated sodium screener at enrollment. Sociodemographic data and health-related social needs were self-reported. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between sodium intake and participant characteristics. This analysis presents a cross-sectional examination of the baseline characteristics of participants enrolled in the myBPmyLife study. Results: Among 600 included participants, 96 (16.0%) were from the FQHC. Mean age was 60.1 (SD 13.5) years; 48.2% (289/600) were women, and 13.0% (78/600) were Black. FQHC participants were significantly younger (mean age 47.9, SD 11.1 vs 62.5, SD 12.7 years), more likely to be Black (43/96, 44.8% vs 35/504, 6.9%), and 8.5 times more likely to have difficulty paying for their health-related social needs. Mean baseline sodium intake was 3082.3 (SD 1072.5) mg/day, with 85.5% (513/600) of participants exceeding the World Health Organization's recommended daily sodium limit. Baseline sodium intake was significantly higher for FQHC participants (mean difference 381.1, SD 1064.2 mg/d; 95% CI 84.5-677.7; P=.01), men (mean difference 543.9, SD 1038.3 mg/d; 95% CI 377.3-710.5; P<.001), Black participants (mean difference 442.5, SD 1043.4 mg/d; 95% CI 119.7-765.3; P=.008) and those with difficulty affording basic needs (mean difference 338.1, SD 1066.7 mg/d; 95% CI 95.2-581.0; P=.02). Sodium intake was lower in older participants (-196.4 mg/d per 10 years; 95% CI -258.0 to -134.9; P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, age, gender, and race remained independently associated with sodium intake, while differences by site and health-related social needs were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Differences in sodium intake were observed across sociodemographic groups. While the enrollment site was not independently associated with sodium intake after adjustment, it played a role in shaping the participant population, evidenced by the differences in demographics and health-related social needs among participants based on enrollment site. These findings underscore the importance of recruiting from distinct clinical settings to capture a range of contextual factors that influence health behaviors. Clinical trials aiming for representativeness should consider both individual- and community-level factors during recruitment to more accurately inform interventions and health outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».