Therapeutic drug monitoring of dolutegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV: A retrospective study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
3 Background: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral regimens are recommended as first-line and salvage therapy for HIV in all populations. Achieving therapeutic DTG plasma concentrations in paediatric patients, however, may be challenging due to interindividual variability and adherence challenges. The utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), particularly in paediatrics, remains understudied. This study aimed to describe the use and usefulness of DTG TDM in paediatric patients. Materials and methods: TDM data were collected retrospectively from the Québec Antiretroviral Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2022. Inclusion criteria were subjects under 18 years old with at least one DTG TDM. We excluded subjects if all their samples' time post-dose were unknown or in the first half of the dosing interval. For samples not drawn exactly at the end of the dosing interval, trough concentrations (Ctau) were estimated with mean population half-lives for specific age or weight groups. The efficacy and toxicity Ctau thresholds were ≥0.32 and ≥1.47 mg/L, respectively. Viral suppression was defined as a viral load <50 copies/mL. Interindividual and intra-individual coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. An independent t-test was used to compare mean Ctau in subjects with and without viral suppression. Results: Fifty-three subjects (55% female) contributed 249 DTG samples (mean (SD) 8.6 (4.5) samples per subject). At the time of first DTG TDM, the mean (SD) age and weight were 11.1 (4.2) years and 43.6 (18.8) kg, respectively, and 86% of subjects had viral suppression. TDM was prescribed for the indication ‘paediatrics’ or ‘control’ in 90.8% of cases. The mean (SD) Ctau was 2.07 (1.65) mg/L, with 21% Ctau results being therapeutic, 4.8% subtherapeutic and 55% supratherapeutic (19% were unknown due to missing or absorption-phase time post-dose). Pharmacists recommended DTG intake without food in 17.3% of TDM reports and recommended a dose decrease if the presence of bothersome central nervous system side effects in 45.8% of reports. Following these recommendations, no dose decreases were done. All Ctau (n = 6) in children weighing 6 to <14 kg were supratherapeutic. This proportion was also high in patients weighing 30 to <40 kg (64%) and >40 kg (56%). Interindividual variability was high (CV 65.4%), while intra-individual variability was lower (median CV 25.6%). No significant difference in mean Ctau was found between patients with and without viral suppression (p > 0.05). Proportions of viral suppression increased from 86% to 93% across the first four TDMs, despite relatively stable proportions of Ctau above the efficacy threshold. Proportions of Ctau within the therapeutic window increased from 18.2% to 36.8%. The proportion of supratherapeutic Ctau decreased from 60.4% to 39.3%. Among seven subjects with at least one subtherapeutic Ctau, 85.7% reached therapeutic levels by their last TDM. Conclusions: A large DTG Ctau interindividual variability and proportion of supratherapeutic levels were seen in paediatric patients. It remains unclear if these high DTG Ctau are clinically relevant in this population. Improved virologic outcomes over successive TDMs suggest some potential benefit. Current DTG weight-band dosing recommendations could be optimized to limit unnecessarily high concentrations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».