MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413940363 · doi:10.1002/bcp.70209

Therapeutic drug monitoring of dolutegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV: A retrospective study

2025· article· en· W4413940363 on OpenAlexaffabout
Éric Pilote, Cheryl Li Ling Lim, Abdelkarim Khiraoui, Jason Brophy, Marie‐Élaine Métras, Christos Karatzios, Fatima Kakkar, Roseline Thibeault, Amélie Marsot, Nathanael Sheehan

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolutegravirMedicineDrugRetrospective cohort studyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PediatricsTherapeutic drug monitoringPharmacologyAntiretroviral therapyInternal medicineVirologyViral load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3 Background: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral regimens are recommended as first-line and salvage therapy for HIV in all populations. Achieving therapeutic DTG plasma concentrations in paediatric patients, however, may be challenging due to interindividual variability and adherence challenges. The utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), particularly in paediatrics, remains understudied. This study aimed to describe the use and usefulness of DTG TDM in paediatric patients. Materials and methods: TDM data were collected retrospectively from the Québec Antiretroviral Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Program between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2022. Inclusion criteria were subjects under 18 years old with at least one DTG TDM. We excluded subjects if all their samples' time post-dose were unknown or in the first half of the dosing interval. For samples not drawn exactly at the end of the dosing interval, trough concentrations (Ctau) were estimated with mean population half-lives for specific age or weight groups. The efficacy and toxicity Ctau thresholds were ≥0.32 and ≥1.47 mg/L, respectively. Viral suppression was defined as a viral load <50 copies/mL. Interindividual and intra-individual coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. An independent t-test was used to compare mean Ctau in subjects with and without viral suppression. Results: Fifty-three subjects (55% female) contributed 249 DTG samples (mean (SD) 8.6 (4.5) samples per subject). At the time of first DTG TDM, the mean (SD) age and weight were 11.1 (4.2) years and 43.6 (18.8) kg, respectively, and 86% of subjects had viral suppression. TDM was prescribed for the indication ‘paediatrics’ or ‘control’ in 90.8% of cases. The mean (SD) Ctau was 2.07 (1.65) mg/L, with 21% Ctau results being therapeutic, 4.8% subtherapeutic and 55% supratherapeutic (19% were unknown due to missing or absorption-phase time post-dose). Pharmacists recommended DTG intake without food in 17.3% of TDM reports and recommended a dose decrease if the presence of bothersome central nervous system side effects in 45.8% of reports. Following these recommendations, no dose decreases were done. All Ctau (n = 6) in children weighing 6 to <14 kg were supratherapeutic. This proportion was also high in patients weighing 30 to <40 kg (64%) and >40 kg (56%). Interindividual variability was high (CV 65.4%), while intra-individual variability was lower (median CV 25.6%). No significant difference in mean Ctau was found between patients with and without viral suppression (p > 0.05). Proportions of viral suppression increased from 86% to 93% across the first four TDMs, despite relatively stable proportions of Ctau above the efficacy threshold. Proportions of Ctau within the therapeutic window increased from 18.2% to 36.8%. The proportion of supratherapeutic Ctau decreased from 60.4% to 39.3%. Among seven subjects with at least one subtherapeutic Ctau, 85.7% reached therapeutic levels by their last TDM. Conclusions: A large DTG Ctau interindividual variability and proportion of supratherapeutic levels were seen in paediatric patients. It remains unclear if these high DTG Ctau are clinically relevant in this population. Improved virologic outcomes over successive TDMs suggest some potential benefit. Current DTG weight-band dosing recommendations could be optimized to limit unnecessarily high concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207