Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate to severe crohn’s disease: Results from the one-year SEQUENCE open-label Long-term extension
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background : Part 2 of the SEQUENCE study examines the long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB), an IL-23 p19 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD). We report the 1-year results from part 2 of the SEQUENCE study. Methods: In part 2 of SEQUENCE, pts randomized to the RZB arm who completed the week (wk) 48 visit could continue on open-label 360mg subcutaneous (SC) RZB maintenance dose every 8 wks (Q8w). [ 1 ] Pts with inadequate response during part 2 could receive rescue therapy (1x 600mg intravenous RZB, then 360mg RZB SC Q8w). Clinical remission (per CDAI and per stool frequency [SF]/abdominal pain score [APS]), steroid-free clinical remission, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ] response, and IBDQ remission were assessed at wks 52 (baseline of OLE), 76, and 100. Data were assessed for all intent-to-treat (ITT) pts using as observed (AO) regardless of rescue therapy as well as per nonresponder imputation (NRI), where patients were categorised as nonresponders for visits with missing assessments, visits after premature discontinuation of study, and visits after initiation of rescue therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported on or after the first dose in part 2 were analysed Results: 224 pts entered part 2 of SEQUENCE. Among the ITT pts, clinical remission rates (AO) remained stable from wk52 to wk100 (CDAI: 75.3% [168/223] to 84.4% [141/167]; SF/APS: 71.2% [158/222] to 74.7% [124/166]) ([ Fig. 1 ]). Most pts who achieved clinical remission were not receiving steroids at the corresponding visits ([ Fig. 2 ]). Pts also demonstrated sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in IBDQ response (86.7% [157/181]; AO) and IBDQ remission (65.3% [126/193]; AO) at wk100 ([ Fig. 1 ]). Similar results to AO were observed per NRI ([ Fig. 2 ]). 16 (7.1%) pts received rescue therapy during part 2, of which 77.8% (7/9) achieved wk100 clinical remission (AO). TEAEs and TEAEs of safety interest were consistent with the known safety profile of RZB. Adjudicated major cardiovascular adverse events, malignancies, serious infections and hepatic events remained stable with no new safety risks identified ([ Table 1 ]). [ 2 ] [ 3 ] No deaths occurred during the OLE. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Table 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) 600 mg IV/360 mg SC RZB (N=262) n (%) Overall TEAE Any TEAE 243 (92.7) TEAE related to study drug according to the investigator 87 (33.2) Severe TEAE 65 (24.8) Serious TEAE 47 (17.9) TEAE leading to discontinuation study drug 15 (5.7) Death 0 TEAE of safety interest Adjudicated MACE events 0 Serious infections 17 (2.9) Opportunistic infections excluding tuberculosis and herpes zoster 2 (0.3) Malignant tumours 4 (0.7) Herpes zoster 3 (0.5) Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 2 (0.3) Hypersensitivity 52 (8.8) Hepatic events 36 (6.1) Injection site reactions 13 (2.2) E, events; CTE, continuous trial extension; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; OLE, open-label extension; PY, patient-years; RZB, risankizumab; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. E/100PYs=Events per 100 patient-years. Safety summary includes all patients who received at least one dose of study drug during OLE. TEAEs during OLE were defined as events that begin either on or after the first dose of the study drug and within 140 days after the last dose of study drug in OLE for patients who do not participate in CTE or until first dose of CTE if the patient is enrolled into CTE. Conclusion: Pts who received 100 wks of continuous RZB therapy in SEQUENCE demonstrated durable clinical efficacy and quality of life benefits. The safety profile is consistent with the known safety profile of RZB and supports long-term RZB treatment. Publication History Article published online: 04 September 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».