Sustained corticosteroid-sparing effects of upadacitinib maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe crohn’s disease: 2-year results from the U-ENDURE long-term extension study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is a concern for patients (pts) with Crohn’s disease (CD), as prolonged use is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective, reversible JAK inhibitor, approved for moderate-to-severe CD, demonstrated CS-sparing efficacy with a consistent safety profile through maintenance week (wk) 52. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] We evaluated the long-term efficacy of UPA in achieving CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes in pts in the U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods: Pts who completed the U-ENDURE 52-wk maintenance study were eligible for the LTE study where they continued their assigned treatment (1x daily UPA 15mg [UPA15] or UPA 30mg [UPA30]). Efficacy was assessed from LTE wk0-48, among pts with 2 year (yr) (100wk) of total maintenance therapy, within the overall pts and in pts with baseline (BL) CS use (induction wk0). CS-free endpoints (without CS use for≥90 days), included clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score [SF/APS] and CDAI), endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission, were evaluated using both as-observed and nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods, with NRI analysis presented in text. Safety was not evaluated here but was reported previously [ 3 ]. Results: Among pts with 2 yr of total maintenance therapy, 35.7% (87/244) received CS at baseline , with 13.1% (32/244) receiving CS at any time during the LTE regardless of BL CS use. Among pts taking BL CS and those who received CS at any time during the LTE (n=20), the median (range) time of CS use was 127.5 (2-1589) days. CS-free clinical remission at LTE wk0 and wk48 per SF/APS (overall pts: UPA15, 71.7%, 58.9%; UPA30, 81.8%, 57.7%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 71.8%, 53.8%; UPA30, 79.2%, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 1A, B ]) and CDAI criteria (overall pts: UPA15, 74.8%, 60.7%; UPA30, 83.9%, 65.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 74.4%, 56.4%; UPA30, 81.3%, 58.3%, NRI, [ Fig. 1C, D ]). At LTE wk48, high rates of UPA-treated pts achieved CS-free endoscopic response (overall pts: UPA15, 48.6%; UPA30, 55.5%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 38.5%; UPA30, 60.4%, NRI) and CS-free endoscopic remission (overall pts: UPA15, 33.6%; UPA30, 46.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 28.2%; UPA30, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 2 ]). Fig. 1 Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free clinical remission was evaluated throughout LTE among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) SF/APS clinical remission was defined as average daily, very soft, or liquid SF≤2.8 and average daily, AP score≤1.0, and both not greater than induction baseline. C and D) Clinical remission per CDAI was defined as CDAI<150. AO, as observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SF/APS, stool frequency/abdominal pain score; UPA, upadacitinib, wk, week. Fig. 2 Corticosteroid-Free Endoscopic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free endoscopic outcomes were evaluated at LTE wk 0 and wk 48 among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue therapy in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD>50% from baseline of the induction study (or for patients with an SES-CD of 4 at baseline of the induction study, at least a 2-point reduction from baseline), as scored by a central reviewer. Endoscopies were performed annually. C and D) Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no subscore>1 in any individual variable baseline, as scored by a central reviewer and measured up to LTE wk 48. AO, as-observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for patients with Crohn’s disease; UPA, upadacitinib; wk, week. Conclusion: Pts with moderate-to-severe CD who received long-term UPA maintenance treatment sustained high rates of CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes, suggesting that UPA may serve as an effective long-term CS-sparing therapy. Publication History Article published online: 04 September 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».