MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414039794 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1810741

Sustained corticosteroid-sparing effects of upadacitinib maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe crohn’s disease: 2-year results from the U-ENDURE long-term extension study

2025· article· en· W4414039794 sur OpenAlexaff
Irina Blumenstein, Vipul Jairath, Marla C. Dubinsky, Luc Biedermann, Toshimitsu Fujii, Colla Cunneen, Elena Dubcenco, Sharanya Ford, A Garrison, Edward V. Loftus

Notice bibliographique

RevueZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCorticosteroidMaintenance therapyCrohn's diseaseTerm (time)Internal medicineDiseaseChemotherapyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is a concern for patients (pts) with Crohn’s disease (CD), as prolonged use is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective, reversible JAK inhibitor, approved for moderate-to-severe CD, demonstrated CS-sparing efficacy with a consistent safety profile through maintenance week (wk) 52. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] We evaluated the long-term efficacy of UPA in achieving CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes in pts in the U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods: Pts who completed the U-ENDURE 52-wk maintenance study were eligible for the LTE study where they continued their assigned treatment (1x daily UPA 15mg [UPA15] or UPA 30mg [UPA30]). Efficacy was assessed from LTE wk0-48, among pts with 2 year (yr) (100wk) of total maintenance therapy, within the overall pts and in pts with baseline (BL) CS use (induction wk0). CS-free endpoints (without CS use for≥90 days), included clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score [SF/APS] and CDAI), endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission, were evaluated using both as-observed and nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods, with NRI analysis presented in text. Safety was not evaluated here but was reported previously [ 3 ]. Results: Among pts with 2 yr of total maintenance therapy, 35.7% (87/244) received CS at baseline , with 13.1% (32/244) receiving CS at any time during the LTE regardless of BL CS use. Among pts taking BL CS and those who received CS at any time during the LTE (n=20), the median (range) time of CS use was 127.5 (2-1589) days. CS-free clinical remission at LTE wk0 and wk48 per SF/APS (overall pts: UPA15, 71.7%, 58.9%; UPA30, 81.8%, 57.7%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 71.8%, 53.8%; UPA30, 79.2%, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 1A, B ]) and CDAI criteria (overall pts: UPA15, 74.8%, 60.7%; UPA30, 83.9%, 65.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 74.4%, 56.4%; UPA30, 81.3%, 58.3%, NRI, [ Fig. 1C, D ]). At LTE wk48, high rates of UPA-treated pts achieved CS-free endoscopic response (overall pts: UPA15, 48.6%; UPA30, 55.5%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 38.5%; UPA30, 60.4%, NRI) and CS-free endoscopic remission (overall pts: UPA15, 33.6%; UPA30, 46.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 28.2%; UPA30, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 2 ]). Fig. 1 Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free clinical remission was evaluated throughout LTE among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) SF/APS clinical remission was defined as average daily, very soft, or liquid SF≤2.8 and average daily, AP score≤1.0, and both not greater than induction baseline. C and D) Clinical remission per CDAI was defined as CDAI<150. AO, as observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SF/APS, stool frequency/abdominal pain score; UPA, upadacitinib, wk, week. Fig. 2 Corticosteroid-Free Endoscopic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free endoscopic outcomes were evaluated at LTE wk 0 and wk 48 among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue therapy in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD>50% from baseline of the induction study (or for patients with an SES-CD of 4 at baseline of the induction study, at least a 2-point reduction from baseline), as scored by a central reviewer. Endoscopies were performed annually. C and D) Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no subscore>1 in any individual variable baseline, as scored by a central reviewer and measured up to LTE wk 48. AO, as-observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for patients with Crohn’s disease; UPA, upadacitinib; wk, week. Conclusion: Pts with moderate-to-severe CD who received long-term UPA maintenance treatment sustained high rates of CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes, suggesting that UPA may serve as an effective long-term CS-sparing therapy. Publication History Article published online: 04 September 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueZeitschrift für GastroenterologieMême sujetInflammatory Bowel DiseaseTravaux en français237 207