MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414039794 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1810741

Sustained corticosteroid-sparing effects of upadacitinib maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe crohn’s disease: 2-year results from the U-ENDURE long-term extension study

2025· article· en· W4414039794 on OpenAlexaff
Irina Blumenstein, Vipul Jairath, Marla C. Dubinsky, Luc Biedermann, Toshimitsu Fujii, Colla Cunneen, Elena Dubcenco, Sharanya Ford, A Garrison, Edward V. Loftus

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCorticosteroidMaintenance therapyCrohn's diseaseTerm (time)Internal medicineDiseaseChemotherapyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is a concern for patients (pts) with Crohn’s disease (CD), as prolonged use is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral, selective, reversible JAK inhibitor, approved for moderate-to-severe CD, demonstrated CS-sparing efficacy with a consistent safety profile through maintenance week (wk) 52. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] We evaluated the long-term efficacy of UPA in achieving CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes in pts in the U-ENDURE long-term extension (LTE) study. Methods: Pts who completed the U-ENDURE 52-wk maintenance study were eligible for the LTE study where they continued their assigned treatment (1x daily UPA 15mg [UPA15] or UPA 30mg [UPA30]). Efficacy was assessed from LTE wk0-48, among pts with 2 year (yr) (100wk) of total maintenance therapy, within the overall pts and in pts with baseline (BL) CS use (induction wk0). CS-free endpoints (without CS use for≥90 days), included clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score [SF/APS] and CDAI), endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission, were evaluated using both as-observed and nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods, with NRI analysis presented in text. Safety was not evaluated here but was reported previously [ 3 ]. Results: Among pts with 2 yr of total maintenance therapy, 35.7% (87/244) received CS at baseline , with 13.1% (32/244) receiving CS at any time during the LTE regardless of BL CS use. Among pts taking BL CS and those who received CS at any time during the LTE (n=20), the median (range) time of CS use was 127.5 (2-1589) days. CS-free clinical remission at LTE wk0 and wk48 per SF/APS (overall pts: UPA15, 71.7%, 58.9%; UPA30, 81.8%, 57.7%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 71.8%, 53.8%; UPA30, 79.2%, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 1A, B ]) and CDAI criteria (overall pts: UPA15, 74.8%, 60.7%; UPA30, 83.9%, 65.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 74.4%, 56.4%; UPA30, 81.3%, 58.3%, NRI, [ Fig. 1C, D ]). At LTE wk48, high rates of UPA-treated pts achieved CS-free endoscopic response (overall pts: UPA15, 48.6%; UPA30, 55.5%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 38.5%; UPA30, 60.4%, NRI) and CS-free endoscopic remission (overall pts: UPA15, 33.6%; UPA30, 46.0%; pts with BL CS use: UPA15, 28.2%; UPA30, 54.2%, NRI, [ Fig. 2 ]). Fig. 1 Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free clinical remission was evaluated throughout LTE among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) SF/APS clinical remission was defined as average daily, very soft, or liquid SF≤2.8 and average daily, AP score≤1.0, and both not greater than induction baseline. C and D) Clinical remission per CDAI was defined as CDAI<150. AO, as observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SF/APS, stool frequency/abdominal pain score; UPA, upadacitinib, wk, week. Fig. 2 Corticosteroid-Free Endoscopic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Upadacitinib Through Week 48 of the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension Study. Patients on CS at baseline of induction began a mandatory taper at induction wk 4. CS-free endoscopic outcomes were evaluated at LTE wk 0 and wk 48 among patients who abstained from CS use for 90 days before assessment. Patients were blinded until the last patient completed wk 52 of maintenance. For NRI analysis on binary variables, patients were categorized as “nonresponder” after initiation of any protocol rescue medications or missing data. For AO analysis, all available baseline measurements before initiation of open-label UPA 30 mg QD rescue therapy in LTE were used for analysis, and no missing data were imputed. A and B) Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD>50% from baseline of the induction study (or for patients with an SES-CD of 4 at baseline of the induction study, at least a 2-point reduction from baseline), as scored by a central reviewer. Endoscopies were performed annually. C and D) Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no subscore>1 in any individual variable baseline, as scored by a central reviewer and measured up to LTE wk 48. AO, as-observed; CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; CI, confidence interval; CS, corticosteroid; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; QD, once daily; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for patients with Crohn’s disease; UPA, upadacitinib; wk, week. Conclusion: Pts with moderate-to-severe CD who received long-term UPA maintenance treatment sustained high rates of CS-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes, suggesting that UPA may serve as an effective long-term CS-sparing therapy. Publication History Article published online: 04 September 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für GastroenterologieSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207