Outcomes misaligned in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS): implications for trial design
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The m.3243A>G variant in the MT-TL1 gene is the most prevalent pathogenic variant in mitochondrial DNA in adults, associated with a wide clinical spectrum from asymptomatic individuals to mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome. Although pharmacological trials in mitochondrial disorders are increasing, the lack of validated endpoints remains a significant barrier to therapeutic development. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to evaluate patients with and without mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome to identify factors associated with disease burden. Seventeen individuals genetically confirmed to harbour the heteroplasmic m.3243A>G pathogenic variant were enrolled: six who met the consensus-based diagnostic criteria for mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome (median age: 30.0 (inter-quartile range: 29.3–45.0) years). Ten patients who did not have a previous history of stroke-like episodes were assigned as ‘non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes’ (age: 37.5 (32.8–48.3) years). Of these patients in the non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes group, seven exhibited variable features of mitochondrial disease, including hearing loss, diabetes mellitus, migraine and gastrointestinal involvement, while the remaining three were asymptomatic. One patient was excluded from analysis due to a confirmed ischaemic stroke unrelated to mitochondrial disease. Assessments included disease severity (Newcastle mitochondrial disease adult scale) and patient-reported outcomes of fatigue (fatigue impact scale), health-related quality of life (Newcastle Mitochondrial-QoL), mental well-being (Warwick–Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale), autonomic symptoms (the composite autonomic symptom) and physical activity (The International Physical Activity Questionnaire). Performance outcomes included timed-up and go, handgrip strength, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and accelerometry. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included for comparison of accelerometry data (age: 35.5 (28.8–50.5) years). Despite comparable age and mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy, patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome had significantly higher disease burden, reduced exercise capacity and lower levels of objectively measured physical activity compared to non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes and controls (P < 0.05–0.001). Patient-reported outcomes did not significantly differ between mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome/non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes. While non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes patients showed expected alignment between perceived and objective measures, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome patients demonstrated weak, absent, or paradoxical associations. This mismatch may reflect altered symptom perception, cognitive impairment, or disease-related adaptation. These findings underscore the complexity of disease expression in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome. Regulatory agencies encourage the inclusion of patient-centred endpoints; however, this study highlights the potential limitations of relying solely on patient-reported outcomes. The divergence between subjective and objective assessments supports the need for multi-dimensional outcomes that integrate both patient perspectives and objective measures to enhance the reliability and interpretability of clinical trials in primary mitochondrial disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».