Outcomes misaligned in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS): implications for trial design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The m.3243A>G variant in the MT-TL1 gene is the most prevalent pathogenic variant in mitochondrial DNA in adults, associated with a wide clinical spectrum from asymptomatic individuals to mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome. Although pharmacological trials in mitochondrial disorders are increasing, the lack of validated endpoints remains a significant barrier to therapeutic development. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to evaluate patients with and without mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome to identify factors associated with disease burden. Seventeen individuals genetically confirmed to harbour the heteroplasmic m.3243A>G pathogenic variant were enrolled: six who met the consensus-based diagnostic criteria for mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome (median age: 30.0 (inter-quartile range: 29.3–45.0) years). Ten patients who did not have a previous history of stroke-like episodes were assigned as ‘non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes’ (age: 37.5 (32.8–48.3) years). Of these patients in the non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes group, seven exhibited variable features of mitochondrial disease, including hearing loss, diabetes mellitus, migraine and gastrointestinal involvement, while the remaining three were asymptomatic. One patient was excluded from analysis due to a confirmed ischaemic stroke unrelated to mitochondrial disease. Assessments included disease severity (Newcastle mitochondrial disease adult scale) and patient-reported outcomes of fatigue (fatigue impact scale), health-related quality of life (Newcastle Mitochondrial-QoL), mental well-being (Warwick–Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale), autonomic symptoms (the composite autonomic symptom) and physical activity (The International Physical Activity Questionnaire). Performance outcomes included timed-up and go, handgrip strength, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and accelerometry. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included for comparison of accelerometry data (age: 35.5 (28.8–50.5) years). Despite comparable age and mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy, patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome had significantly higher disease burden, reduced exercise capacity and lower levels of objectively measured physical activity compared to non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes and controls (P < 0.05–0.001). Patient-reported outcomes did not significantly differ between mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome/non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes. While non-mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes patients showed expected alignment between perceived and objective measures, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome patients demonstrated weak, absent, or paradoxical associations. This mismatch may reflect altered symptom perception, cognitive impairment, or disease-related adaptation. These findings underscore the complexity of disease expression in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes syndrome. Regulatory agencies encourage the inclusion of patient-centred endpoints; however, this study highlights the potential limitations of relying solely on patient-reported outcomes. The divergence between subjective and objective assessments supports the need for multi-dimensional outcomes that integrate both patient perspectives and objective measures to enhance the reliability and interpretability of clinical trials in primary mitochondrial disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".