Abstract C119: Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) across clinical and real-world studies: An analysis of ARAMIS, DAROL, DEAR-EXT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction and Objective Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death among Black/African American patients worldwide. Although phase 3 studies are the gold standard, their strict study inclusion criteria may restrict generalizability. Real-world evidence can enhance our understanding of treatment effectiveness in clinical settings. This analysis evaluates darolutamide treatment in Black/African American nmCRPC populations from three different studies. Methods ARAMIS (global, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial) included nmCRPC patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/mL and PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤10 months. DAROL (global, prospective, observational study) and DEAR-EXT (US, retrospective, chart-review cohort study) included nmCRPC patients for whom the decision to initiate darolutamide treatment was made pre-enrollment at the discretion of the treating physician, who had disease progression despite treatment with ADT, no evidence of metastases on conventional imaging (DAROL), and no evidence of metastases in physician notes or metastasis codes before initiating androgen receptor inhibitor treatment (DEAR-EXT). Key outcomes included PSA response, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs], which may not be as well-captured in real-world retrospective chart reviews). Results Baseline characteristics in Black/African American patients (ARAMIS n=28; DAROL n=23; DEAR-EXT n=116) varied slightly between studies: median age was ARAMIS 73 y, DAROL 74 y, DEAR-EXT 79 y; 64%, 67%, and 60%, respectively, had Gleason score <8. Median baseline PSA in ARAMIS, DAROL and DEAR-EXT was 8.3, 4.2, and 4.1 ng/mL; median PSADT was 4.9, 5.8, and 8.7 months. At any time, the proportion of patients reaching 90% reduction in PSA from baseline was ARAMIS 79%, DAROL 86%, DEAR-EXT 74%; 2-y MFS rates were 100%, 89%, and 76%; and 2-y OS rates were 100%, 89%, and 95%. Incidences of any-grade TEAEs were 82% and 70% in the prospective ARAMIS and DAROL studies, and 22% in the retrospective DEAR-EXT study; only fatigue showed ≥10% incidence (14–22%) in all three studies. TEAEs led to discontinuation in 4–10% of patients in each study, indicating consistent tolerability. Conclusion Black/African American patient populations are often underrepresented in clinical trials. This analysis of data from clinical and real-world prospective and retrospective studies indicated that despite differences in study designs and settings, darolutamide was effective and well-tolerated. Clear benefits in PSA response, MFS and OS were observed with darolutamide treatment in Black/African American patients across the ARAMIS, DAROL and DEAR-EXT studies. Citation Format: Christopher Pieczonka, Geoffrey Gotto, Nasreen Khan, Patrick Adorjan, Mercedeh Ghadessi, Frank Verholen, Neal Shore. Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) across clinical and real-world studies: An analysis of ARAMIS, DAROL, DEAR-EXT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C119.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».