Abstract C119: Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) across clinical and real-world studies: An analysis of ARAMIS, DAROL, DEAR-EXT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction and Objective Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death among Black/African American patients worldwide. Although phase 3 studies are the gold standard, their strict study inclusion criteria may restrict generalizability. Real-world evidence can enhance our understanding of treatment effectiveness in clinical settings. This analysis evaluates darolutamide treatment in Black/African American nmCRPC populations from three different studies. Methods ARAMIS (global, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial) included nmCRPC patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/mL and PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤10 months. DAROL (global, prospective, observational study) and DEAR-EXT (US, retrospective, chart-review cohort study) included nmCRPC patients for whom the decision to initiate darolutamide treatment was made pre-enrollment at the discretion of the treating physician, who had disease progression despite treatment with ADT, no evidence of metastases on conventional imaging (DAROL), and no evidence of metastases in physician notes or metastasis codes before initiating androgen receptor inhibitor treatment (DEAR-EXT). Key outcomes included PSA response, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs], which may not be as well-captured in real-world retrospective chart reviews). Results Baseline characteristics in Black/African American patients (ARAMIS n=28; DAROL n=23; DEAR-EXT n=116) varied slightly between studies: median age was ARAMIS 73 y, DAROL 74 y, DEAR-EXT 79 y; 64%, 67%, and 60%, respectively, had Gleason score <8. Median baseline PSA in ARAMIS, DAROL and DEAR-EXT was 8.3, 4.2, and 4.1 ng/mL; median PSADT was 4.9, 5.8, and 8.7 months. At any time, the proportion of patients reaching 90% reduction in PSA from baseline was ARAMIS 79%, DAROL 86%, DEAR-EXT 74%; 2-y MFS rates were 100%, 89%, and 76%; and 2-y OS rates were 100%, 89%, and 95%. Incidences of any-grade TEAEs were 82% and 70% in the prospective ARAMIS and DAROL studies, and 22% in the retrospective DEAR-EXT study; only fatigue showed ≥10% incidence (14–22%) in all three studies. TEAEs led to discontinuation in 4–10% of patients in each study, indicating consistent tolerability. Conclusion Black/African American patient populations are often underrepresented in clinical trials. This analysis of data from clinical and real-world prospective and retrospective studies indicated that despite differences in study designs and settings, darolutamide was effective and well-tolerated. Clear benefits in PSA response, MFS and OS were observed with darolutamide treatment in Black/African American patients across the ARAMIS, DAROL and DEAR-EXT studies. Citation Format: Christopher Pieczonka, Geoffrey Gotto, Nasreen Khan, Patrick Adorjan, Mercedeh Ghadessi, Frank Verholen, Neal Shore. Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Black/African American patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) across clinical and real-world studies: An analysis of ARAMIS, DAROL, DEAR-EXT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C119.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".