Authenticating Hafu Identities on Instagram: A Small Stories Analysis of Interactions on Hafugods
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Described as “the predominant narrative environment for contemporary storytellers” (Mäkelä & Meretoja, 2022), social media are attracting increasing attention as sites for the study of a wide range of everyday narrative practices. Moreover, storytelling has become integrated into platform architectures through features such as Stories on Instagram, Snapchat and Facebook, and is being celebrated as “the ideal vehicle for presenting an authentic self” (Georgakopoulou, 2022). The word authenticity finds its roots in the Greek authentikós, (autós, self) and is associated with notions such as realness, genuineness, credibility and truthfulness (Lacoste, Leimgruber & Breyer, 2014, p2). In interactional sociolinguistics, authenticity is treated as an effect of discursive performance and negotiation of identity between participants in an interaction. The analytical focus is therefore on the discursive strategies and interactional processes that authenticate a person’s claim to a particular identity or group membership. This chapter explores the implications of authenticity as discursive performance in relation to hafu (ハーフ) identities, through a Small Stories (Georgakopoulou, 2013; 2016) analysis of an Instagram account called hafugods. Hafu is a racialised identity term used to describe someone who is mixed-ethnic or mixed-race Japanese, and hafugods presents itself as a space for telling stories about what it means to be hafu. The analysis demonstrates how storytelling is being mobilised for the performance of hafu identities, and reveals how alignment strategies such as ‘ritual appreciation’ and ‘knowing participation’ (Georgakopoulou, 2016) serve as authenticating practices of proving membership to the group, and by extension, a hafu identity. Furthermore, it draws on the concept of ‘enoughness’ (Blommaert & Varis, 2013) – premised on the idea that identities are constructed through discursive orientations towards emblematic features of particular identities that are configured in specific arrangements to emphasise ‘authenticity’ – to illustrate how iterative interactional practices and semiotic resources become established as emblematic of authentic hafu identities in this particular space. Through these analyses, this chapter provides a qualitative account of “how diasporic and transnational people…create discourse spaces in which to articulate marginal voices, negotiate plural identities, construct the meanings and boundaries of community” (Androutsopoulos & Juffermans, 2014, p3), and contributes to the ongoing exploration of the role of social media in mediating collective identifications, constructions of counternarratives and reimagining group identities (Bonilla & Rosa, 2015).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle