Efficacy of PSMA PET/CT radiomics analysis for risk stratification in newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a multicenter study
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT plays an increasing role in prostate cancer management. Radiomics analysis of PSMA PET/CT images may provide additional information for risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PSMA PET/CT radiomics analysis in differentiating between Gleason Grade Groups (GGG 1–3 vs. GGG 4–5) and predicting PSA levels (below vs. at or above 20 ng/ml) in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS: In this multicenter study, patients with confirmed primary prostate cancer were enrolled who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging. Inclusion criteria required intraprostatic lesions on PET and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade information. Three different segments were delineated including intraprostatic PSMA-avid lesions on PET, the whole prostate in PET, and the whole prostate in CT. Radiomic features (RFs) were extracted from all segments. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through principal component analysis (PCA) prior to model training on data from two centers (186 cases) with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was validated with external data set (57 cases) using various machine learning models including random forest, nearest centroid, support vector machine (SVM), calibrated classifier CV and logistic regression. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 243 patients with a median age of 69 (range: 46–89) were enrolled. For distinguishing GGG 1–3 from GGG 4–5, the nearest centroid classifier using radiomic features (RFs) from whole-prostate PET achieved the best performance in the internal test set, while the random forest classifier using RFs from PSMA-avid lesions in PET performed best in the external test set. However, when considering both internal and external test sets, a calibrated classifier CV using RFs from PSMA-avid PET data showed slightly improved overall performance. Regarding PSA level classification (< 20 ng/ml vs. ≥20 ng/ml), the nearest centroid classifier using RFs from the whole prostate in PET achieved the best performance in the internal test set. In the external test set, the highest performance was observed using RFs derived from the concatenation of PET and CT. Notably, when combining both internal and external test sets, the best performance was again achieved with RFs from the concatenated PET/CT data. CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT radiomic features, particularly features derived from intraprostatic PSMA-avid lesions, may provide valuable information for pre-biopsy risk stratification in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle