Efficacy of PSMA PET/CT radiomics analysis for risk stratification in newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a multicenter study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT plays an increasing role in prostate cancer management. Radiomics analysis of PSMA PET/CT images may provide additional information for risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PSMA PET/CT radiomics analysis in differentiating between Gleason Grade Groups (GGG 1–3 vs. GGG 4–5) and predicting PSA levels (below vs. at or above 20 ng/ml) in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS: In this multicenter study, patients with confirmed primary prostate cancer were enrolled who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging. Inclusion criteria required intraprostatic lesions on PET and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade information. Three different segments were delineated including intraprostatic PSMA-avid lesions on PET, the whole prostate in PET, and the whole prostate in CT. Radiomic features (RFs) were extracted from all segments. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through principal component analysis (PCA) prior to model training on data from two centers (186 cases) with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was validated with external data set (57 cases) using various machine learning models including random forest, nearest centroid, support vector machine (SVM), calibrated classifier CV and logistic regression. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 243 patients with a median age of 69 (range: 46–89) were enrolled. For distinguishing GGG 1–3 from GGG 4–5, the nearest centroid classifier using radiomic features (RFs) from whole-prostate PET achieved the best performance in the internal test set, while the random forest classifier using RFs from PSMA-avid lesions in PET performed best in the external test set. However, when considering both internal and external test sets, a calibrated classifier CV using RFs from PSMA-avid PET data showed slightly improved overall performance. Regarding PSA level classification (< 20 ng/ml vs. ≥20 ng/ml), the nearest centroid classifier using RFs from the whole prostate in PET achieved the best performance in the internal test set. In the external test set, the highest performance was observed using RFs derived from the concatenation of PET and CT. Notably, when combining both internal and external test sets, the best performance was again achieved with RFs from the concatenated PET/CT data. CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT radiomic features, particularly features derived from intraprostatic PSMA-avid lesions, may provide valuable information for pre-biopsy risk stratification in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".