MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4414586139 · doi:10.63354/cjwoc.v1i2.15859

NSWOCC Fellowship Award

2025· article· en· W4414586139 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Harley

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueStoma care and complications
Établissements canadiensContinental (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExcellenceCertificationSpecialtyHealth careHonourBlueprintQuality (philosophy)Best practice

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada (NSWOCC), we support a culture that values and celebrates excellence. Recognizing excellence involves acknowledging and celebrating exceptional performance, achievements, or contributions in the tri-specialty of wound, ostomy and continence specialized nursing care. The goal is to motivate individuals and teams to maintain high standards and foster this culture of excellence. By launching a Fellowship Program, NSWOCC has a way to provide prestigious recognition focusing on the careers of certified NSWOCs who have made exemplary contributions to the tri-specialty. This program commenced on May 24, 2025. On behalf of Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada (NSWOCC), I am excited to welcome our first inaugural Fellows. Fellowship represents the highest honour for NSWOCC’s most accomplished Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence (NSWOC) who are leaders in clinical practice, education, administration, research and policy. This Fellowship Program honors exceptional contributions to NSWOCC and the nursing specialty of wound, ostomy and continence. Fellows selected for this program are recognized for their major impact in the field of specialized wound, ostomy and continence care from provincial to national to international settings, where they demonstrate leadership, innovation, and dedication to advancing practice. With demonstrated passion and expertise, Fellows contribute to critical quality initiatives that support effective, evidence-based patient-centered care. Through this prestigious designation, Fellows exemplify leadership, expertise, and dedication, shaping the future of specialized wound, ostomy and continence nursing practice to positively impact the Canadian health care system. Fellowship powerfully illustrates the many contexts in which NSWOCs across all designations and career paths make an extraordinary and lasting contribution to society. As this Fellowship Program grows, we can work together to increase the impact of this remarkable resource of wisdom and expertise to advance specialized nursing, education, research and policy leadership. The NSWOCs being inducted as inaugural Fellows reflect a wide diversity of nursing leadership and impact. Every one of these individuals has clearly demonstrated a sustained and powerful commitment to the value of nursing excellence in wound, ostomy and continence specialized care. They are not only inspiring, but they serve as a legacy of the extraordinary leadership contributions they have made. I would like to thank them personally for their dedication and efforts during some very challenging years where they all continued to demonstrate their commitment to their patients, their colleagues and to our association. They did not just show up. They went above and beyond to mentor, support, make change and positively impact patient care, no matter the circumstance. In their role as a Fellow, they will continue to act as mentors to provide ongoing support to NSWOCs and aligned health care professionals working in the tri-specialty of wound, ostomy and continence. For making a difference for nurses, aligned health care professionals and patients, we salute you. They deserve to hold the credential of FNSWOC – Fellow of Nursing in Wound, Ostomy and Continence, and are worthy holders of this credential. We celebrate you, we recognize you and we look forward to many more NSWOCs following in your footsteps as we move into the future. If you are interested in nominating a colleague for this NSWOCC Fellowship Program, please e mail office@nswoc.ca and the nominations package will be e-mailed to you.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,605
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,241

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and ContinenceMême sujetStoma care and complicationsTravaux en français237 207