MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414586139 · doi:10.63354/cjwoc.v1i2.15859

NSWOCC Fellowship Award

2025· article· en· W4414586139 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Harley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStoma care and complications
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceCertificationSpecialtyHealth careHonourBlueprintQuality (philosophy)Best practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada (NSWOCC), we support a culture that values and celebrates excellence. Recognizing excellence involves acknowledging and celebrating exceptional performance, achievements, or contributions in the tri-specialty of wound, ostomy and continence specialized nursing care. The goal is to motivate individuals and teams to maintain high standards and foster this culture of excellence. By launching a Fellowship Program, NSWOCC has a way to provide prestigious recognition focusing on the careers of certified NSWOCs who have made exemplary contributions to the tri-specialty. This program commenced on May 24, 2025. On behalf of Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada (NSWOCC), I am excited to welcome our first inaugural Fellows. Fellowship represents the highest honour for NSWOCC’s most accomplished Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence (NSWOC) who are leaders in clinical practice, education, administration, research and policy. This Fellowship Program honors exceptional contributions to NSWOCC and the nursing specialty of wound, ostomy and continence. Fellows selected for this program are recognized for their major impact in the field of specialized wound, ostomy and continence care from provincial to national to international settings, where they demonstrate leadership, innovation, and dedication to advancing practice. With demonstrated passion and expertise, Fellows contribute to critical quality initiatives that support effective, evidence-based patient-centered care. Through this prestigious designation, Fellows exemplify leadership, expertise, and dedication, shaping the future of specialized wound, ostomy and continence nursing practice to positively impact the Canadian health care system. Fellowship powerfully illustrates the many contexts in which NSWOCs across all designations and career paths make an extraordinary and lasting contribution to society. As this Fellowship Program grows, we can work together to increase the impact of this remarkable resource of wisdom and expertise to advance specialized nursing, education, research and policy leadership. The NSWOCs being inducted as inaugural Fellows reflect a wide diversity of nursing leadership and impact. Every one of these individuals has clearly demonstrated a sustained and powerful commitment to the value of nursing excellence in wound, ostomy and continence specialized care. They are not only inspiring, but they serve as a legacy of the extraordinary leadership contributions they have made. I would like to thank them personally for their dedication and efforts during some very challenging years where they all continued to demonstrate their commitment to their patients, their colleagues and to our association. They did not just show up. They went above and beyond to mentor, support, make change and positively impact patient care, no matter the circumstance. In their role as a Fellow, they will continue to act as mentors to provide ongoing support to NSWOCs and aligned health care professionals working in the tri-specialty of wound, ostomy and continence. For making a difference for nurses, aligned health care professionals and patients, we salute you. They deserve to hold the credential of FNSWOC – Fellow of Nursing in Wound, Ostomy and Continence, and are worthy holders of this credential. We celebrate you, we recognize you and we look forward to many more NSWOCs following in your footsteps as we move into the future. If you are interested in nominating a colleague for this NSWOCC Fellowship Program, please e mail office@nswoc.ca and the nominations package will be e-mailed to you.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2640.115

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and ContinenceSame topicStoma care and complicationsFrench-language works237,207