Transformative L2 Teacher Education Innovations: Insights from Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This edited collection emerges from a foundational premise that teaching should drive intentional transformation, echoing Lev Vygotsky's (1978) vision of education shaping who learners can become.As emphasized in Russell Cross's thoughtful foreword, language teachers' actions cannot be reduced to transmitting content or competencies; rather, teacher education must invite the co-construction of knowledge, emotion, and professional responsibility.Drawing on Vygotskyan sociocultural perspective (Lantolf & Thorne, 2006), the volume shows how mindful mediation and dialogic reflection propel educators beyond surface-level approaches and toward deeper conceptual reasoning (Johnson, 1999) and strategic practices.It advances earlier breakthroughs in L2 teacher education-for instance, situating teacher knowledge in real-world contexts (Freeman & Johnson, 1998) and reframing teachers as active agents in their own growth.By grounding teacher learning in authentic teaching contexts and cultural nuances, the editors underscore that no single formula applies; rather, each setting's unique mediation strategies hold the key.Collaborative inquiry and reflective data illuminate tensions and triumphs in reimagining teaching identities.As a result, this text stands as both a rigorous academic reference and a guide to practical innovation, illustrating how instructors' consciousness and teaching activities can be artfully orchestrated for maximum potential.Indeed, the authors' shared focus on connecting knowledge, identity, and social context offers a forward-thinking approach, equipping teacher educators to navigate the evolving complexities of modern language classrooms worldwide.In doing so, it fosters robust connections among researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers.This publication thus contributes to the L2 teacher education sphere.A central theme across the chapters is how teachers can be supported in exercising professional agency by reshaping classroom norms to foster more equitable learning conditions.In Chapter 1, the volume editors lay the theoretical foundation by arguing that mediational spaces (Johnson & Golombek, 2016) can prompt novice and in-service teachers to challenge everyday assumptions and envision alternative realities.Nicolas Doyle (Chapter 9) shows how volunteer tutors in an under-resourced adult ESL program reclaimed their roles by viewing "language as social practice," shifting from standard packets to context-sensitive instruction.Similarly, Dorothy Worden-Chambers and Bedrettin Yazan (Chapter 5) highlight how teacher candidates' language ideologies can evolve from rigid correctness-based stances to agentive views of grammar, recognizing grammar as meaningful and discourse-dependent.Meanwhile, Meredith Doran and Jacob Rieker (Chapter 11) demonstrate that English Medium Instruction (EMI) faculty-often resistant to adopting "language-teaching" methods-can find novel ways to use English for student engagement and disciplinary thinking, freeing themselves from prescriptive models and reclaiming how content is taught.Although many chapters celebrate teacher choice, some authors address institutional constraints that inevitably shape agency.Nonetheless, these studies collectively propose that reflective tasks, coaching sessions, or collaborative research can enable teachers to re-envision their practice, redefine their roles, and implement changes that respond to local contexts.These interventions underscore teachers' capacity for transformation.A second strand of thought is consistent advocacy for dialogic mediation as a prime driver of teacher development.Paula Golombek (Chapter 3) describes "tiny talks" that serve as immediate post-lesson debriefings, allowing co-teachers to articulate emotional and conceptual dilemmas in real time and exchange supportive solutions.Malba Barahona and colleagues (Chapter 10) document a shift from evaluative, top-down post-observation feedback to more dialogic, question-oriented sessions that invite
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».