MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414876257 · doi:10.18806/tesl.v42i2/1436

Transformative L2 Teacher Education Innovations: Insights from Vygotskian Sociocultural Theory

2025· article· en· W4414876257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. CHOI

Bibliographic record

VenueTESL Canada Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningTeacher educationSociocultural evolutionEducation theoryCritical theoryHigher educationLanguage teacherTeaching method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This edited collection emerges from a foundational premise that teaching should drive intentional transformation, echoing Lev Vygotsky's (1978) vision of education shaping who learners can become.As emphasized in Russell Cross's thoughtful foreword, language teachers' actions cannot be reduced to transmitting content or competencies; rather, teacher education must invite the co-construction of knowledge, emotion, and professional responsibility.Drawing on Vygotskyan sociocultural perspective (Lantolf & Thorne, 2006), the volume shows how mindful mediation and dialogic reflection propel educators beyond surface-level approaches and toward deeper conceptual reasoning (Johnson, 1999) and strategic practices.It advances earlier breakthroughs in L2 teacher education-for instance, situating teacher knowledge in real-world contexts (Freeman & Johnson, 1998) and reframing teachers as active agents in their own growth.By grounding teacher learning in authentic teaching contexts and cultural nuances, the editors underscore that no single formula applies; rather, each setting's unique mediation strategies hold the key.Collaborative inquiry and reflective data illuminate tensions and triumphs in reimagining teaching identities.As a result, this text stands as both a rigorous academic reference and a guide to practical innovation, illustrating how instructors' consciousness and teaching activities can be artfully orchestrated for maximum potential.Indeed, the authors' shared focus on connecting knowledge, identity, and social context offers a forward-thinking approach, equipping teacher educators to navigate the evolving complexities of modern language classrooms worldwide.In doing so, it fosters robust connections among researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers.This publication thus contributes to the L2 teacher education sphere.A central theme across the chapters is how teachers can be supported in exercising professional agency by reshaping classroom norms to foster more equitable learning conditions.In Chapter 1, the volume editors lay the theoretical foundation by arguing that mediational spaces (Johnson & Golombek, 2016) can prompt novice and in-service teachers to challenge everyday assumptions and envision alternative realities.Nicolas Doyle (Chapter 9) shows how volunteer tutors in an under-resourced adult ESL program reclaimed their roles by viewing "language as social practice," shifting from standard packets to context-sensitive instruction.Similarly, Dorothy Worden-Chambers and Bedrettin Yazan (Chapter 5) highlight how teacher candidates' language ideologies can evolve from rigid correctness-based stances to agentive views of grammar, recognizing grammar as meaningful and discourse-dependent.Meanwhile, Meredith Doran and Jacob Rieker (Chapter 11) demonstrate that English Medium Instruction (EMI) faculty-often resistant to adopting "language-teaching" methods-can find novel ways to use English for student engagement and disciplinary thinking, freeing themselves from prescriptive models and reclaiming how content is taught.Although many chapters celebrate teacher choice, some authors address institutional constraints that inevitably shape agency.Nonetheless, these studies collectively propose that reflective tasks, coaching sessions, or collaborative research can enable teachers to re-envision their practice, redefine their roles, and implement changes that respond to local contexts.These interventions underscore teachers' capacity for transformation.A second strand of thought is consistent advocacy for dialogic mediation as a prime driver of teacher development.Paula Golombek (Chapter 3) describes "tiny talks" that serve as immediate post-lesson debriefings, allowing co-teachers to articulate emotional and conceptual dilemmas in real time and exchange supportive solutions.Malba Barahona and colleagues (Chapter 10) document a shift from evaluative, top-down post-observation feedback to more dialogic, question-oriented sessions that invite

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTESL Canada JournalSame topicInnovative Education and Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207