The Triumph of Stupidity and the Ascent of The Asshole: An account of how civilisations always end and why
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<p dir="ltr">While the term “civilisation” is historically contested and conceptually fluid, it remains a useful analytical shorthand for large-scale, complex societies that exhibit sustained institutional, cultural, and technological development. As such entities grow in scale and complexity, they develop increasingly elaborate administrative systems to manage social, economic, and political challenges. This complexity generates epistemic opacity, producing problems that require equally complex solutions, often surpassing the interpretive capacity or stepping outside the confirmation biases of the general population they affect. In response, populations seek simplified narratives that provide emotional reassurance rather than rational clarity. This dynamic creates fertile ground for the ascent of inferior and self-serving leadership. This monograph begins by observing that no complex civilisation has to date survived indefinitely and proposes that this is because they inevitably decline due to the ascendancy of morally and ethically deficient leaders who are unfit to meet the challenges presented by a civilisation’s inevitable burgeoning complexity. In such weakened condition, civilisations become easy targets for social fragmentation, tribalism, mistrust, and civil unrest that exacerbate equally challenging externalities such as climate change and resource mismanagement. In the face of these obstacles, civilisations either dwindle to irrelevance or suffer wholesale collapse. Drawing upon what philosopher Aaron James colloquially calls, and theoretically elaborates as, the asshole personality type, this monograph expands the concept into the assholopath: an entitled, self-interested, shameless, and manipulative personality type who exploits popular collective discomfort with society’s evolving complexity by offering simplistic and corrosive solutions. It also links James’s theoretical characterisation to Carlo Cipolla’s stupidity matrix, providing the added dimension of behavioural consequences rather than merely personality traits. This framework is further connected to the problem of the tribal brain, the evolutionary lag between the pace of biological adaptation and the far greater speed of cultural and technological change, which exacerbates the mismatch between human cognition and modern civilisational complexity. Through examples from contemporary political economics and historical case studies spanning 8,000 years of civilisational rise and decline, the monograph contends that the ascent of the assholopath is not a political aberration, but a structural byproduct selected for by the pressures of complexity in declining civilisations. The triumph of stupidity and the ascent of the assholopath are thus not anomalies but evolutionary outcomes of systemic strain. It concludes that the greatest threat to contemporary Western civilisation comes not from external adversaries but from its own willingness to tolerate, even elevate, the entitled few who treat collective life as personal spoils to be plundered.</p>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle