MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415076418 · doi:10.32920/30331138.v1

The Triumph of Stupidity and the Ascent of The Asshole: An account of how civilisations always end and why

2025· preprint· en· W4415076418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Systems and Global Transformations
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStupidityPoliticsPopulationNarrativeFace (sociological concept)PersonalityExploitCivilizationExternality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p dir="ltr">While the term “civilisation” is historically contested and conceptually fluid, it remains a useful analytical shorthand for large-scale, complex societies that exhibit sustained institutional, cultural, and technological development. As such entities grow in scale and complexity, they develop increasingly elaborate administrative systems to manage social, economic, and political challenges. This complexity generates epistemic opacity, producing problems that require equally complex solutions, often surpassing the interpretive capacity or stepping outside the confirmation biases of the general population they affect. In response, populations seek simplified narratives that provide emotional reassurance rather than rational clarity. This dynamic creates fertile ground for the ascent of inferior and self-serving leadership. This monograph begins by observing that no complex civilisation has to date survived indefinitely and proposes that this is because they inevitably decline due to the ascendancy of morally and ethically deficient leaders who are unfit to meet the challenges presented by a civilisation’s inevitable burgeoning complexity. In such weakened condition, civilisations become easy targets for social fragmentation, tribalism, mistrust, and civil unrest that exacerbate equally challenging externalities such as climate change and resource mismanagement. In the face of these obstacles, civilisations either dwindle to irrelevance or suffer wholesale collapse. Drawing upon what philosopher Aaron James colloquially calls, and theoretically elaborates as, the asshole personality type, this monograph expands the concept into the assholopath: an entitled, self-interested, shameless, and manipulative personality type who exploits popular collective discomfort with society’s evolving complexity by offering simplistic and corrosive solutions. It also links James’s theoretical characterisation to Carlo Cipolla’s stupidity matrix, providing the added dimension of behavioural consequences rather than merely personality traits. This framework is further connected to the problem of the tribal brain, the evolutionary lag between the pace of biological adaptation and the far greater speed of cultural and technological change, which exacerbates the mismatch between human cognition and modern civilisational complexity. Through examples from contemporary political economics and historical case studies spanning 8,000 years of civilisational rise and decline, the monograph contends that the ascent of the assholopath is not a political aberration, but a structural byproduct selected for by the pressures of complexity in declining civilisations. The triumph of stupidity and the ascent of the assholopath are thus not anomalies but evolutionary outcomes of systemic strain. It concludes that the greatest threat to contemporary Western civilisation comes not from external adversaries but from its own willingness to tolerate, even elevate, the entitled few who treat collective life as personal spoils to be plundered.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWorld Systems and Global TransformationsFrench-language works237,207