Transition From a Paper Diary to an Electronic Diary by Parents of Preschool Children With Food Allergies: Pilot Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Food allergies (FAs) can be life-threatening and represent a significant public health concern. The reported prevalence of FA in Japan is 7.6% in 1-year-olds, 6.7% in 2-year-olds, and 4.9% in 3-year-olds. In addition, avoiding allergenic foods, prompt identification, and response are required when symptoms appear. A food diary is a tool for daily dietary management, recording of symptoms, and communication between families of children with FA and health care providers. Conventionally, paper diaries (P-diaries) have been used. Recent technological advancements and the extensive use of smartphones have prompted the development of numerous electronic diaries (E-diaries). However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of E-diaries in Japan. Objective: This study aimed to assess the experiences of parents of preschool children with FA as they transitioned from P-diaries to E-diaries. Methods: For 6 months commencing in October 2020, during the period of movement restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we recruited parents of preschool children diagnosed with FAs by an allergist at a single general hospital. This pilot study used a single-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the feasibility of using an E-diary. To assess parents' views on transitioning to E-diaries from P-diaries, data were collected using semistructured interviews conducted after 6 months of E-diary use. Results: Five parents took part in the study. The problems with P-diaries and the effects and outcomes of E-diaries from the perspective of parents of preschool children with FA were categorized into 52 codes, which were grouped into 19 subcategories and 6 categories. Parents of preschool children with FA reported the following issues: I. difficulties with using a P-diary; II. stress related to sharing information with doctors; III. difficulties in making disease management habitual as issues with P-diary use; IV. ease of using the E-diary as an effect of the transition; V. more efficient sharing of information with doctors; and VI. improved adherence as outcomes of E-diary use. Conclusions: E-diaries may resolve various issues associated with P-diaries and may be useful tools for communication between parents and physicians regarding disease management. Since the number of participants was small (ie, 5) and the study was conducted at a single facility, theoretical saturation was not reached. In the future, it will be necessary to increase the number of participants to validate these findings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».