#3413 Targeted treatment with pegcetacoplan for adolescents with C3G or primary (idiopathic) IC-MPGN in the VALIANT Phase 3 trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and primary (idiopathic) immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) are rare diseases where uncontrolled C3 activation results in excessive glomerular deposition of C3 breakdown products, which may lead to kidney damage and ultimately kidney failure. Both C3G and primary IC-MPGN are frequently diagnosed in adolescence or early adulthood. At onset, children with C3G or primary IC-MPGN present with varying degrees of proteinuria (ranging from mild to nephrotic), hematuria (ranging from microscopic to macroscopic), and sometimes low serum C3 levels. Current treatments are associated with significant side effects and approximately 20% of children progress to kidney failure within 10–15 years of diagnosis, despite treatment. Pegcetacoplan (PEG) binds selectively to C3 and C3b to strongly block C3 activation by classical/lectin/alternative pathways, C3/C5 convertase activity and activation of downstream effectors. PEG targets the pathogenic process in C3G/primary IC-MPGN with the aim of stopping kidney damage. In the Phase 3 VALIANT study (NCT05067127) in patients (pts) aged ≥12 years with native or post-transplant recurrent C3G/primary IC-MPGN treated with a stable regimen, PEG led to glomerular C3 clearance in 71% of pts and achieved significant and sustained reduction in proteinuria across pt subgroups with stabilization of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Here, we report results for the subgroup of adolescent pts (12–17 years). Method VALIANT study design and pt population have been previously described. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive PEG (subcutaneous infusion twice weekly) or placebo (PBO) for 26 weeks as add-on to their standard of care regimen. Adolescent pts had a biopsy-proven diagnosis of C3G or primary IC-MPGN with evidence of active renal disease. Active disease was defined by either biopsy at baseline (optional for this subgroup) or, in those not providing a baseline biopsy, at least one of the following: elevated plasma sC5b-9 concentration, low serum C3 concentration, presence of active urine sediment, or presence of C3 nephritic factor. The primary endpoint was the log-transformed ratio of urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at Week 26 vs baseline. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of pts achieving a composite renal endpoint (≥50% reduction in UPCR and ≤15% reduction in eGFR at Week 26 vs baseline) and eGFR reduction. Results Overall, 124 pts were randomized in VALIANT including 55 adolescent pts (28 PEG, 27 PBO; Table 1). Among adolescent pts at Week 26, PEG treatment led to a significant and clinically meaningful relative reduction in proteinuria of 74.5% (relative change: −73.6% PEG vs 3.7% PBO, p < 0.0001; Table 1). In the PEG group, 16/28 pts (57.1%) achieved the composite renal endpoint, compared to 1/27 pts (3.7%) in the PBO group (p = 0.0016). Additionally, 20/28 pts (71.4%) in the PEG group achieved a ≥50% reduction in proteinuria at Week 26 from baseline vs 1/27 (3.7%) in the PBO group (p = 0.0002). Improvements in proteinuria were accompanied by stabilization of eGFR, with a +9.7 mL/min/1.73 m² relative difference compared to PBO. Mean change in proteinuria from baseline to Week 26 is shown in the Fig. 1. Among 6 adolescents with serious treatment-emergent adverse events (PEG, n = 3; PBO, n = 3), 1 event (pyrexia of undetermined origin) was considered PEG-related. Conclusion Results from VALIANT demonstrate that PEG, a C3/C3b inhibitor that blocks C3 overactivation, is the only treatment to induce clinically meaningful proteinuria reduction and eGFR stabilization compared with placebo in adolescent pts with C3G or primary IC-MPGN. The treatment was well-tolerated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».