SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH FIVE-DAY PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR HIGH-RISK PRIMARY SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Standard of care treatment for high-risk soft tissues sarcoma (STS) of the extremity/trunk includes radiation therapy (RT) and surgical resection. At our center, initial results of a phase II single arm trial of 5-day preoperative RT demonstrated safety and local control comparable to conventional 5-week preoperative RT. The purpose of this study is to assess surgical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing 5-day preoperative RT (30 Gy) followed by surgical resection for high-risk STS of the extremity/trunk. Patients meeting criteria were consented and enrolled in a prospective phase II trial and received preoperative hypofractionated RT (30 Gy over 5 consecutive daily fractions) followed by surgical resection within an average of 4 weeks. Demographic variables included age, sex, diabetes, and smoking status. Tumor variables included: histology, location, and size. Surgical outcomes included rate of limb salvage, bony complications, soft tissue complications after primary surgery (dermatitis, superficial infection, deep infection, drainage, and dehiscence), margin status and rate and type of re-operation. Minimum post-operative follow-up was 3 months. Demographic data was presented with descriptive statistics, with mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) depending on the data distribution. Dichotomous variables were compared using the Fischer's exact test. A total of 94 patients were included with a mean age of 57.1 (SD 17.2): 41 (44%) were female, 10 (11%) were diabetic, and 8 patients (9%) had a significant smoking history. Median follow up was 23.7 months. The most common diagnosis was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (39.4%), then myxoid liposarcoma (23.4%), and myxofibrosarcoma (8.5%). The most common location was the lower extremity (60.6%), then upper extremity (18.1%), pelvis/trunk (17.0%), and ‘other’ (4.3%). Primary wound closure was achieved in 93 patients (98.9%). Twenty-seven (28.7%) cases required local tissue advancement for closure. Residual tumor status included 3 (3.2%) R2 resections, 16 (14.9%) R1 resections, and 77 (81.9%) R0 resections. Twenty-six (27.7%) patients experienced soft-tissue complications with wound dehiscence occurring in 18 patients (19.1%) at a median of 43.5 days (IQR 40.3–85.3) from surgery. Bony complications occurred in 4 patients: 3 pathologic fractures, and 1 osteonecrosis requiring surgery. Rate of limb salvage was 95.7%: 4/94 patients underwent amputation for disease progression at an average of 229.5 days (range: 140–398). Twenty-eight patients (29.8%) required secondary surgery at a mean of 201.07 days from index surgery (range: 5–1,708), including 14 irrigation and debridements, 7 re-excisions, and 8 applications of wound VAC. Patients requiring local soft tissue advancement for primary closure had more soft tissue complications (44.4% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.04). Soft tissue complications were not worse in patients having surgery within 2 weeks of RT (28.5% vs. 27.5%, p = 1). Even upon a more granular analysis, perioperative soft tissue and bony complications for patients with primary STS undergoing surgical resection following 5-day preoperative RT remain low and comparable to conventional 5-week preoperative RT, with a high rate (96%) of limb salvage. Soft tissue complications were higher among patients requiring local soft tissue advancement for wound closure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».