MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415439009 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.112

SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH FIVE-DAY PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR HIGH-RISK PRIMARY SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA

2025· article· en· W4415439009 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph K. Kendal, Norman E. Peterson, R.R. Savjani, Lucas M. Wessel, Jie Deng, Vishruth K. Reddy, Joseph G. Crompton, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Frederick C. Eilber

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft tissue sarcomaSarcomaMyxofibrosarcomaLiposarcomaInterquartile rangeRadiation therapySurgical marginSoft tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standard of care treatment for high-risk soft tissues sarcoma (STS) of the extremity/trunk includes radiation therapy (RT) and surgical resection. At our center, initial results of a phase II single arm trial of 5-day preoperative RT demonstrated safety and local control comparable to conventional 5-week preoperative RT. The purpose of this study is to assess surgical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing 5-day preoperative RT (30 Gy) followed by surgical resection for high-risk STS of the extremity/trunk. Patients meeting criteria were consented and enrolled in a prospective phase II trial and received preoperative hypofractionated RT (30 Gy over 5 consecutive daily fractions) followed by surgical resection within an average of 4 weeks. Demographic variables included age, sex, diabetes, and smoking status. Tumor variables included: histology, location, and size. Surgical outcomes included rate of limb salvage, bony complications, soft tissue complications after primary surgery (dermatitis, superficial infection, deep infection, drainage, and dehiscence), margin status and rate and type of re-operation. Minimum post-operative follow-up was 3 months. Demographic data was presented with descriptive statistics, with mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) depending on the data distribution. Dichotomous variables were compared using the Fischer's exact test. A total of 94 patients were included with a mean age of 57.1 (SD 17.2): 41 (44%) were female, 10 (11%) were diabetic, and 8 patients (9%) had a significant smoking history. Median follow up was 23.7 months. The most common diagnosis was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (39.4%), then myxoid liposarcoma (23.4%), and myxofibrosarcoma (8.5%). The most common location was the lower extremity (60.6%), then upper extremity (18.1%), pelvis/trunk (17.0%), and ‘other’ (4.3%). Primary wound closure was achieved in 93 patients (98.9%). Twenty-seven (28.7%) cases required local tissue advancement for closure. Residual tumor status included 3 (3.2%) R2 resections, 16 (14.9%) R1 resections, and 77 (81.9%) R0 resections. Twenty-six (27.7%) patients experienced soft-tissue complications with wound dehiscence occurring in 18 patients (19.1%) at a median of 43.5 days (IQR 40.3–85.3) from surgery. Bony complications occurred in 4 patients: 3 pathologic fractures, and 1 osteonecrosis requiring surgery. Rate of limb salvage was 95.7%: 4/94 patients underwent amputation for disease progression at an average of 229.5 days (range: 140–398). Twenty-eight patients (29.8%) required secondary surgery at a mean of 201.07 days from index surgery (range: 5–1,708), including 14 irrigation and debridements, 7 re-excisions, and 8 applications of wound VAC. Patients requiring local soft tissue advancement for primary closure had more soft tissue complications (44.4% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.04). Soft tissue complications were not worse in patients having surgery within 2 weeks of RT (28.5% vs. 27.5%, p = 1). Even upon a more granular analysis, perioperative soft tissue and bony complications for patients with primary STS undergoing surgical resection following 5-day preoperative RT remain low and comparable to conventional 5-week preoperative RT, with a high rate (96%) of limb salvage. Soft tissue complications were higher among patients requiring local soft tissue advancement for wound closure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207