Effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine in a real-world setting over 1 year of follow-up after the three-dose primary schedule: an interim analysis of a phase 4 study in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background RTS,S/AS01 E was first introduced within the Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme in selected areas in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. A series of post-introduction observational studies were initiated in these areas to assess RTS,S/AS01 E safety and effectiveness in real-world settings. Here, we report the results of the interim analysis of the EPI-MAL-003 study secondary objectives related to vaccine effectiveness. Methods EPI-MAL-003 was a phase 4, disease surveillance study with prospective cohort event monitoring. The study was performed in routine medical practice settings at 12 sites (four per country) in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. Children younger than 18 months were enrolled in exposed clusters (sites where RTS,S/AS01 E was introduced) and unexposed clusters; data were collected via active surveillance. In an interim analysis, we estimated the effect of vaccination on the incidence of malaria, all-cause hospitalisations, and malaria-related hospitalisations, the prevalence of anaemia among hospitalised children, and mortality over 1 year of follow-up after primary vaccination with three RTS,S/AS01 E doses. These endpoints were analysed in the effectiveness analysis set. The primary endpoints are reported elsewhere, together with secondary safety endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03855995, and is completed. Findings The first child was enrolled on March 21, 2019, and the cutoff date for the current analysis was Nov 2, 2023. 45 000 children were enrolled (22 426 [49·8%] were female and 22 574 [50·25%] were male). 39 463 children were included in the analyses. When comparing vaccinated children from exposed clusters with unvaccinated children from unexposed clusters, country-adjusted incidence rate ratios were 0·70 (95% CI 0·67–0·73; p<0·001) for any malaria, 0·42 (0·30–0·60; p<0·001) for severe malaria, 0·64 (0·56–0·72; p<0·001) for malaria-related hospitalisations, 0·79 (0·74–0·84; p<0·001) for all-cause hospitalisations, and 0·83 (0·64–1·09; p=0·18) for all-cause mortality. The adjusted odds ratio for the prevalence of anaemia among children who were hospitalised (vaccinated children from exposed clusters vs unvaccinated children from unexposed clusters) was 0·81 (95% CI 0·73–0·90; p<0·001). Similar trends were observed in a before–after comparison with unvaccinated children enrolled in the EPI-MAL-002 study conducted before the RTS,S/AS01 E introduction. Interpretation Over 1 year of follow-up after the third vaccine dose, vaccination with RTS,S/AS01 E in real-world settings showed significant reductions in malaria burden. These findings reinforce the continued use of RTS,S/AS01 E vaccination in children as an effective public health measure to reduce malaria-related illness and mortality in endemic regions, and highlight its relevance for future malaria control strategies. Funding GSK.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».