Attending a one-to-one child-centered movement therapy program improves multiple outcomes among children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: an exploratory prospective cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Children with neurodevelopmental and/or intellectual disabilities/disorders (NDID) often face barriers that limit their participation in typical school and community activities alongside their peers. Adapted, community-based physical activity programs may help bridge this gap by offering safe and engaging environments that promote integration, socialization, and learning. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of the Empowering Steps Movement Therapy (ESMT™) one-to-one personalized physical activity program on children and youth with NDID. Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted to collect information regarding the changes in participants' motor skills (measured by BOT-2-SF), social and leisure adaptive skills (measured by ABAS-II), community and home participation (measured by PEM-CY), and quality of life (measured by KIDSCREEN-27). Forty-two children and youth with NDID attending the ESMT™ program were followed for 12 months with follow-up every 3 months. A linear mixed-effects (LME) model was used to analyze longitudinal changes, as well as studying the influence of children's and families' baseline characteristics on the outcomes. Results: = 0.08). Positive trends were also observed in home and community participation. However, improvements were minimal for social adaptive skills, and a slight decline was noted in leisure adaptive skills and quality of life. Several potential confounders including parental education, socioeconomic status, and participation in other community-based programs were examined, indicating that some may play a significant role. Notably, the type of underlying condition contributing to neurodevelopmental disability appeared to be an important effect modifier for both motor skills and social adaptive skills. Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, this study suggests that individualized, one-to-one physical activity programs which provide individualized scaffolding tailored to each child's unique needs, may yield meaningful improvements across multiple domains in children with NDID. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings and further support the adoption of personalized, socially engaging approaches in therapeutic physical activity settings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».