ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-INTEGRATED RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP METRICS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Radiographic measures such as the acetabular index and IHDI classification are important metrics for diagnosing and monitoring developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). These measures are typically performed manually by radiologists and/or orthopedic surgeons, which can be time-consuming and introduce inter- and intra-rater variability. In this study, we introduce the preliminary development of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system tailored for calculating DDH metrics to improve efficiency and reduce measurement variability. We have utilized radiographs from a global prospective registry of infants and children diagnosed with DDH to develop an AI-integrated system. This proposed system combines two distinct components: an image segmentation model and a landmark detection model. Both of the image segmentation model and the landmark models are underpinned by the publicly available Segment Anything Model (SAM), notable for its efficiency with relatively small datasets. In the proposed model, both the segmentation model and landmark model employ pre-trained SAM models. By fine tuning the SAM model's weights, the models are used for different tasks: The segmentation model identifies different hip bone areas: the Ilium, capital femoral epiphysis and the rest of proximal femur bilaterally. The landmark model is trained to learn the landmarks for DDH Metrics (triradiate cartilage and the superolateral edge of acetabulum). We developed and evaluated the networks using AP pelvis radiographs obtained in 300 patients from a global prospective registry of patients with DDH with ethics board approval. In total 200 samples were used in the training process, 50 samples for testing and 50 samples for validation. Both of the pretrained SAM models finished the training in ~10 training epochs. We compared accuracy of landmark localization vs. gold-standard human experts, the difference between the resulting AI-generated vs. expert-generated acetabular indices, and accuracy of IHDI classification (AI vs. expert via confusion matrix). The preliminary result shows the proposed model converges quickly with relatively small samples to finish the training process. Figure 2a shows a predicted sample from the Segmentation Model and Figure 2b shows a predicted sample from the landmark detection model. These models will be used to automate measurement of the acetabular index and the IHDI grade. By integrating the outputs of these two models, we can utilize the identified landmarks for precise radiological measurements. Preliminary outcomes underscore the promising potential of our innovative approach. Effective AI-Integrated radiographic analysis will enable standardization of DDH metrics to improve research efficiency and comparability of results, while also holding potential to improve clinical efficiency and diagnostic accuracy, even in low-resource settings. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».