MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207295 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.045

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-INTEGRATED RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP METRICS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN

2025· article· en· W4416207295 on OpenAlexaff
Sheng Liu, Gourav Jandial, Emily K. Schaeffer, A. Rakkunedeth Hareendranathan, John P. Sloan, Kishore Mulpuri, Jacob L. Jaremko

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandmarkSegmentationPelvisOrthopedic surgeryEpiphysisImage segmentationRadiographyFemur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiographic measures such as the acetabular index and IHDI classification are important metrics for diagnosing and monitoring developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). These measures are typically performed manually by radiologists and/or orthopedic surgeons, which can be time-consuming and introduce inter- and intra-rater variability. In this study, we introduce the preliminary development of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system tailored for calculating DDH metrics to improve efficiency and reduce measurement variability. We have utilized radiographs from a global prospective registry of infants and children diagnosed with DDH to develop an AI-integrated system. This proposed system combines two distinct components: an image segmentation model and a landmark detection model. Both of the image segmentation model and the landmark models are underpinned by the publicly available Segment Anything Model (SAM), notable for its efficiency with relatively small datasets. In the proposed model, both the segmentation model and landmark model employ pre-trained SAM models. By fine tuning the SAM model's weights, the models are used for different tasks: The segmentation model identifies different hip bone areas: the Ilium, capital femoral epiphysis and the rest of proximal femur bilaterally. The landmark model is trained to learn the landmarks for DDH Metrics (triradiate cartilage and the superolateral edge of acetabulum). We developed and evaluated the networks using AP pelvis radiographs obtained in 300 patients from a global prospective registry of patients with DDH with ethics board approval. In total 200 samples were used in the training process, 50 samples for testing and 50 samples for validation. Both of the pretrained SAM models finished the training in ~10 training epochs. We compared accuracy of landmark localization vs. gold-standard human experts, the difference between the resulting AI-generated vs. expert-generated acetabular indices, and accuracy of IHDI classification (AI vs. expert via confusion matrix). The preliminary result shows the proposed model converges quickly with relatively small samples to finish the training process. Figure 2a shows a predicted sample from the Segmentation Model and Figure 2b shows a predicted sample from the landmark detection model. These models will be used to automate measurement of the acetabular index and the IHDI grade. By integrating the outputs of these two models, we can utilize the identified landmarks for precise radiological measurements. Preliminary outcomes underscore the promising potential of our innovative approach. Effective AI-Integrated radiographic analysis will enable standardization of DDH metrics to improve research efficiency and comparability of results, while also holding potential to improve clinical efficiency and diagnostic accuracy, even in low-resource settings. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207