218.5: Developing personas to enable tailored public health communications: The case of organ donation in Quebec.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Organ donation is often described as a miracle of modern medicine. Futhermore, organ donation and transplantation are known to have a positive impact on families of organ donors and organ recipients, on public health and on the overall societal burden of organ failure. Notwithstanding the potential for such a far reaching impact, Canada is faced with a chronic shortage of organs for transplant from deceased donors. In Québec, as of December 2022, only half of the eligible population had registered for organ donation (Transplant Québec 2023). This is despite findings from a 2022 public poll commissioned by Transplant Québec (Léger 2022) showing that over 90% of the Québec population views organ donation favourably. This raises the question of what is preventing more people, already positively disposed toward organ donation, from registering as donors. Furthermore, even if people do register, studies have shown that having conversations with loved ones about organ donation is key in ultimately securing consent in tragic moments of death (NHS Blood and Transplant 2014). In 2020 in Québec, 20% of families refused organ donation despite prior registered consent by the individual (Transplant Québec 2021). Multiple reviews of high-performing organ donation and transplantation systems agree on the critically important role of an informed and engaged public in improving organ donation and transplantation systems. There is a need to understand peoples’ views, beliefs and behaviours; to engage in conversations with them; and to gain public support and trust (Johnston-Webber et al. 2023; Norris 2022; Williment et al. 2023). Moreover, the explosion of digital media technologies has created unprecedented opportunities to converse with large numbers of people in a more personalized way, which considers varying perceptions, attitudes and behaviours (Evans et al. 2019; NHS Blood and Transplant 2014). Transplant Québec undertook between 2019 and 2023 to develop a portrait of donation. The ultimate goal was to inform tailored public communication strategies regarding (1) registering to become an organ donor and (2) having family conversations about organ donation intentions. In a cost-constrained health and public health context in which perfect data are rarely available, personas can inform customized communication, education and actions. That said, personas necessarily over-simplify the real-world characteristics and richness of a population and each individual within it; this can and should be acknowledged in their use. Personas can be seen as evolutive, to be continually refined over time both as additional data become available, and as feedback is received from communications and educational initiatives that draw upon them.The strategic communications company hired by Transplant Québec to assist in the persona development process was Companie and cie. The company hired by Transplant Québec to implement the public polls and focus groups that partially informed the personas was Leger. Linda Benoit of Transplant Québec was instrumental in translating the personas from French to English for the purposes of this article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle